Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29288495›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of pathology2018

PanCancer insights from The Cancer Genome Atlas: the pathologist's perspective.

Lee Ad Cooper, Elizabeth G Demicco, Joel H Saltz, Reid T Powell, Arvind Rao, Alexander J Lazar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of pathology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 104 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
104citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

104 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Toward Optimizing the Impact of Digital Pathology and Augmented Intelligence on Issues of Diagnosis, Grading, Staging, and Classification.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lee Ad CooperDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3504-4965
Elizabeth G DemiccoDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4144-8824
Joel H SaltzDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Reid T PowellCenter for Translational Cancer Research, Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M University, Houston, TX, USA.
Arvind RaoDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Alexander J LazarDepartments of Pathology, Genomic Medicine, and Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6395-4499

Funding

TCIA Sustainment and Scalability - Platforms for Quantitative Imaging Informatics in Precision MedicineU24CA215109 · NCI · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI BANERJEE, IMON, PRIOR, FRED WILLIAM · 2017 to 2021
$8.5M
Image Mining for Comparative Analysis of Expression Patterns in Tissue MicroarrayR01LM009239 · NLM · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI FORAN, DAVID J, SALTZ, JOEL H. · 2007 to 2016
$4.5M
Synthesizing Image-derived Heterogeneity with Genomic measurements for Assessing Disease Aggressiveness in Lower Grade GliomasR37CA214955 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI KURTEK, SEBASTIAN, RAO, ARVIND · 2018 to 2024
$3.9M
Advanced Development of an Open-source Platform for Web-based Integrative Digital Image Analysis in CancerU24CA194362 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI COOPER, LEE, GUTMAN, DAVID ANDREW · 2015 to 2019
$3.6M
Tools to Analyze Morphology and Spatially Mapped Molecular DataU24CA180924 · NCI · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI SALTZ, JOEL H. · 2014 to 2019
$3.6M
Informatics for Integrative Brain Tumor Whole Slide AnalysisR01LM011119 · NLM · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI FORAN, DAVID J, SALTZ, JOEL H. · 2011 to 2014
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R37 CA214955NCI NIH HHS U24 CA180924NCI NIH HHS U24 CA194362NCI NIH HHS U24 CA215109NLM NIH HHS R01 LM009239NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) represents one of several international consortia dedicated to performing comprehensive genomic and epigenomic analyses of selected tumour types to advance our understanding of disease and provide an open-access resource for worldwide cancer research. Thirty-three tumour types (selected by histology or tissue of origin, to include both common and rare diseases), comprising >11 000 specimens, were subjected to DNA sequencing, copy number and methylation analysis, and transcriptomic, proteomic and histological evaluation. Each cancer type was analysed individually to identify tissue-specific alterations, and make correlations across different molecular platforms. The final dataset was then normalized and combined for the PanCancer Initiative, which seeks to identify commonalities across different cancer types or cells of origin/lineage, or within anatomically or morphologically related groups. An important resource generated along with the rich molecular studies is an extensive digital pathology slide archive, composed of frozen section tissue directly related to the tissues analysed as part of TCGA, and representative formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded, haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained diagnostic slides. These H&E image resources have primarily been used to verify diagnoses and histological subtypes with some limited extraction of standard pathological variables such as mitotic activity, grade, and lymphocytic infiltrates. Largely overlooked is the richness of these scanned images for more sophisticated feature extraction approaches coupled with machine learning, and ultimately correlation with molecular features and clinical endpoints. Here, we document initial attempts to exploit TCGA imaging archives, and describe some of the tools, and the rapidly evolving image analysis/feature extraction landscape. Our hope is to inform, and ultimately inspire and challenge, the pathology and cancer research communities to exploit these imaging resources so that the full potential of this integral platform of TCGA can be used to complement and enhance the insightful integrated analyses from the genomic and epigenomic platforms. Copyright © 2017 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorDatabases, GeneticEpigenesis, GeneticGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome, HumanGenomicsHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedNeoplasmsPathology, MolecularPhenotypePredictive Value of TestsBiomarkers, Tumorcomputational histologydigital pathologygenomicsimage analysisPanCancerTCGAThe Cancer Genome Atlas

Identifiers

PMID29288495
PMCPMC6240356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.