Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29288415›Full record

ArticleAmbio2018

Ecosystem changes following the 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes in Japan: Future perspectives.

Roy C Sidle, Takashi Gomi, Munemitsu Akasaka, Kenta Koyanagi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Roy C SidleSustainability Research Centre, University of the Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Dr., Sippy Downs, QLD, 4556, Australia. rsidle@usc.edu.au.
Takashi GomiDepartment of International Environmental and Agricultural Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Fuchu, Tokyo, 183-5809, Japan.
Munemitsu AkasakaInstitute of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Fuchu, Tokyo, 183-5809, Japan.
Kenta KoyanagiFaculty of Science and Forestry, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistokatu 2, 80100, Joensuu, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major earthquakes cause widespread environmental and socioeconomic disruptions that persist for decades. Extensive ground disturbances that occurred during the shallow-focus Kumamoto earthquakes will affect future sustainability of ecosystem services west of Aso volcano. Numbers of earthquake-initiated landslides per unit area were higher in grasslands than forests, likely owing to greater root reinforcement of trees, and mostly initiated on ridgelines and/or convex/planar hillslopes. Most landslides traveled short distances and did not initially evolve into debris flows; resultant sediments and wood accumulating in headwater channels can be mobilized into debris flows during future storms. Fissures along ridgelines may promote water ingress and induce future landslides and debris flows that affect residents downstream. Native grasses are at risk because of habitat fragmentation caused by ground disturbances, extensive damage to rural roads, and abandonment of traditional pasture management practices. Sustainable management of affected areas needs to consider future risk of cascading hazards and long-term socioeconomic impacts.

Indexed as

EarthquakesEcosystemDisastersJapanLandslidesCascading disastersEcosystem resettingLandslidesNatural hazardsSemi-natural grasslandsTipping points

Identifiers

PMID29288415
PMCPMC6131130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.