ArticleSurgical endoscopy2018
HIFU, a noninvasive and effective treatment for chyluria: 15 years of experience.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retroperitoneoscopic lymphatic disconnection for non-filarial chyluria in Vietnamese adults: a case series.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- Renal pedicle lymphatic ligation for non-parasitic chyluria via retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery: a single-center 12-year experience.Translational andrology and urology · 2023Article
- A review of high-intensity focused ultrasound as a novel and non-invasive interventional radiology technique.Journal of interventional medicine · 2022Article
- Chyluria-a review of literature and a modified sclerotherapy regimen.Turkish journal of urology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe current treatment therapies for chyluria are often invasive and recurrent. Here, we investigated a novel noninvasive treatment of chyluria with high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and evaluated its clinical efficacy.
methods155 patients with chyluria were treated with HIFU ablation and followed up over a period of 15 years from May 2000 to December 2015. Routine examinations including urine color observation, color Doppler ultrasound examination, blood serum test of Cr, BUN, and albumin, and detection of urinary chyle were performed before and after the treatment, 1 week, 1 and 6 months post-treatment, and followed up via telephone and other forms. We lost contact with 54 patients during the course of the study.
resultsIn the 101 complete cases, the serum levels of Cr and BUN and the color Doppler ultrasound examination did not reveal significant differences before and after the treatment. However, there was a significant increase in the hemoglobin and albumin levels, as well as the body weight after the HIFU treatment. The other 54 patients also showed an improvement of the symptoms after the HIFU treatment before losing contact.
conclusionsOur results suggest that the HIFU ablation therapy is a feasible, effective, and noninvasive method for the treatment of chyluria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.