Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29288181›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Research protocol for the Picture Talk Project: a qualitative study on research and consent with remote Australian Aboriginal communities.

Emily F M Fitzpatrick, Maureen Carter, June Oscar, Tom Lawford, Alexandra L C Martiniuk, Heather A D'Antoine, Elizabeth J Elliott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Comprehensive Review of Optimal Approaches to Co-Design in Health with First Nations Australians.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emily F M FitzpatrickDiscipline of Child and Adolescent Health, University of Sydney Medical School, Sydney, Australia.
Maureen CarterNindilingarri Cultural Health Services, Fitzroy Crossing, Australia.
June OscarMarninwarntikura Women's Resource Centre, Fitzroy Crossing, Australia.
Tom LawfordKimberley Aboriginal Law and Culture Centre, Fitzroy Crossing, Australia.
Alexandra L C MartiniukSchool of Public Health, University of Sydney Medical School, Sydney, Australia.
Heather A D'AntoineDivision of Education and Capacity Building, Menzies School of Health Research, Darwin, Australia.
Elizabeth J ElliottDiscipline of Child and Adolescent Health, University of Sydney Medical School, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionResearch with Indigenous populations is not always designed with cultural sensitivity. Few publications evaluate or describe in detail seeking consent for research with Indigenous participants. When potential participants are not engaged in a culturally respectful manner, participation rates and research quality can be adversely affected. It is unethical to proceed with research without truly informed consent. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We describe a culturally appropriate research protocol that is invited by Aboriginal communities of the Fitzroy Valley in Western Australia. The Picture Talk Project is a research partnership with local Aboriginal leaders who are also chief investigators. We will interview Aboriginal leaders about research, community engagement and the consent process and hold focus groups with Aboriginal community members about individual consent. Cultural protocols will be applied to recruit and conduct research with participants. Transcripts will be analysed using NVivo10 qualitative software and themes synthesised to highlight the key issues raised by the community about the research process. This protocol will guide future research with the Aboriginal communities of the Fitzroy Valley and may inform the approach to research with other Indigenous communities of Australia or the world. It must be noted that no community is the same and all research requires local consultation and input. To conduct culturally sensitive research, respected local people from the community who have knowledge of cultural protocol and language are engaged to guide each step of the research process from the project design to the delivery of results. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was granted by the University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (No. 2012/348, reference:14760), the Western Australia Country Health Service Ethics Committee (No. 2012:15), the Western Australian Aboriginal Health Ethics Committee and reviewed by the Kimberley Aboriginal Health Planning Forum Research Sub-Committee (No. 2012-008). Results will be disseminated through peer review articles, a local Fitzroy Valley report and conference presentations.

Indexed as

CommunicationCulturally Competent CareHealth Services, IndigenousInformed ConsentPatient ParticipationBiomedical ResearchFemaleHumansLeadershipMaleQualitative ResearchResearch DesignWestern Australiaaboriginalaustraliacommunityconsentindigenousqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID29288181
PMCPMC5770946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.