Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29288179›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Association of individual and neighbourhood socioeconomic status with physical activity and screen time in seventh-grade boys and girls in Berlin, Germany: a cross-sectional study.

Lilian Krist, Christin Bürger, Nanette Ströbele-Benschop, Stephanie Roll, Fabian Lotz, Nina Rieckmann, Jacqueline Müller-Nordhorn, Stefan N Willich, Falk Müller-Riemenschneider

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Examining School and Neighborhood Effects of Socioeconomic Status on Childhood Obesity in the U.S.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lilian KristInstitute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité University Medical Center, Berlin, Germany.
Christin BürgerInstitute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité University Medical Center, Berlin, Germany.
Nanette Ströbele-BenschopInstitute of Nutritional Medicine, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
Stephanie RollInstitute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité University Medical Center, Berlin, Germany.
Fabian LotzInstitute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité University Medical Center, Berlin, Germany.
Nina RieckmannInstitute of Public Health, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Jacqueline Müller-NordhornInstitute of Public Health, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Stefan N WillichInstitute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité University Medical Center, Berlin, Germany.
Falk Müller-RiemenschneiderInstitute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité University Medical Center, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesFew studies have explored the impact of neighbourhood socioeconomic status (SES) on health behaviours in youths in Germany. Our aim was to investigate the association of individual and neighbourhood SES with physical activity (PA) and screen time (ST) in students aged 12-13 years in Berlin.

designCross-sectional study.

settingSecondary schools (high schools and integrated secondary schools) in Berlin, Germany.

participantsA total of 2586 students aged 12-13 years (seventh grade).

main outcome measuresSociodemographics, anthropometric data and health behaviours were assessed by self-report during classes. Primary outcome was the association of individual and neighbourhood SES with meeting daily PA and exceeding daily ST recommendations. Students' characteristics were described with means or percentages. Comparisons were performed using generalised linear mixed model yielding ORs with 95% CIs.

resultsMean (±SD) age was 12.5±0.5 years, 50.5% were girls and 34.1% had a migrant background. When adjusting for individual covariates, associations of low versus high individual SES were 0.85 (0.48; 1.52) for PA and 2.08 (1.26; 3.43) for ST. Associations of low versus high neighbourhood SES were 1.76 (1.12; 2.75) for PA and 1.54 (1.10; 2.17) for ST. After additional adjustment for school type and school neighbourhood SES, associations comparing low versus high individual and neighbourhood SES were attenuated for PA (individual SES 0.74 (0.41; 1.33) and neighbourhood SES 1.51 (0.93; 2.46)) and ST (individual SES 1.88 (1.12; 3.14) and neighbourhood SES 1.40(0.98; 2.00).

conclusionsLower individual and neighbourhood SES were associated with higher ST. Lower neighbourhood but not individual SES was associated with higher PA. After consideration of school type and school neighbourhood SES associations were attenuated and became insignificant for the relationship between neighbourhood SES, PA and ST. Further research is warranted to unravel the complex relationships between individual SES, neighbourhood SES and school environment to develop more targeted health promotion strategies in the future.

Indexed as

ExerciseHealth BehaviorResidence CharacteristicsSocial ClassAdolescentAnthropometryBerlinChildComputersCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMultivariate AnalysisSchoolsSelf Reportcommunity child healthepidemiologypreventive medicinepublic healthsocial medicinesports medicine

Identifiers

PMID29288179
PMCPMC5770905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.