Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29288172›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2017

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a guided internet- and mobile-based depression intervention for individuals with chronic back pain: protocol of a multi-centre randomised controlled trial.

Jiaxi Lin, Lasse Sander, Sarah Paganini, Sandra Schlicker, David Ebert, Matthias Berking, Jürgen Bengel, Stephanie Nobis, Dirk Lehr, Oskar Mittag and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Models of care for managing non-specific low back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jiaxi LinDepartment of Rehabilitation Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Lasse SanderDepartment of Rehabilitation Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Sarah PaganiniDepartment of Rehabilitation Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Sandra SchlickerDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
David EbertDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Matthias BerkingDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Jürgen BengelDepartment of Rehabilitation Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Stephanie NobisDepartment of Gerontology, University of Vechta, Vechta, Germany.
Dirk LehrDepartment of Psychology, Leuphana University Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany.
Oskar MittagSection of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation, Center for Medical Biometry and Medical Informatics, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Heleen RiperDepartment of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Harald BaumeisterDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
University of Freiburg · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DELeuphana University of Lüneburg · DEUniversität Ulm · DEUniversity of Vechta · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDepression often co-occurs with chronic back pain (CBP). Internet and mobile-based interventions (IMIs) might be a promising approach for effectively treating depression in this patient group. In the present study, we will evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a guided depression IMI for individuals with CBP (eSano BackCare-D) integrated into orthopaedic healthcare. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this multicentre randomised controlled trial of parallel design, the groups eSano BackCare-D versus treatment as usual will be compared. 210 participants with CBP and diagnosed depression will be recruited subsequent to orthopaedic rehabilitation care. Assessments will be conducted prior to randomisation and 9 weeks (post-treatment) and 6 months after randomisation. The primary outcome is depression severity (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17). Secondary outcomes are depression remission and response, health-related quality of life, pain intensity, pain-related disability, self-efficacy and work capacity. Demographic and medical variables as well as internet affinity, intervention adherence, intervention satisfaction and negative effects will also be assessed. Data will be analysed on an intention-to-treat basis with additional per-protocol analyses. Moreover, a cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis will be conducted from a societal perspective after 6 months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: All procedures are approved by the ethics committee of the Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg and the data security committee of the German Pension Insurance (Deutsche Rentenversicherung). The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented on international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00009272; Pre-results.

Indexed as

AdultBack PainChronic PainCognitive Behavioral TherapyCost-Benefit AnalysisDepressionFemaleGermanyHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesQuality of LifeResearch DesignSeverity of Illness Indexchronic back paindepressione-mental-healthhealth care services researchrandomized controlled trialstudy protocol

Identifiers

PMID29288172
PMCPMC5770830
OpenAlexW2775963546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.