Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29288078›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of allergy and clinical immunology2018

Immune mechanisms of oral immunotherapy.

Michael D Kulis, Sarita U Patil, Erik Wambre, Brian P Vickery

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. CD8Nature communications · 2022
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Introduction to Oral Immunity.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Oral Immunotherapy Should Play a Key Role in Preschool Food Allergy Management.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael D KulisDepartment of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Sarita U PatilDepartment of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass.
Erik WambreDepartment of Immunology, Benaroya Research Institute, Seattle, Wash.
Brian P VickeryDepartment of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC. Electronic address: bvickery@email.unc.edu.

Funding

Humoral mechanisms of tolerance in peanut oral immunotherapyK23AI121491 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI PATIL, SARITA U · 2016 to 2020
$975k
NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI121491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral immunotherapy (OIT) has demonstrated reproducibly successful desensitization in patients with food allergy completing clinical trials and, in some studies, sustained unresponsiveness. These clinical outcomes have been associated with characteristic modifications in the allergen-specific immune response, but a detailed synthesis of OIT's mechanisms of action is lacking. In this rostrum we review the current evidence regarding the human immune response to OIT, explore possible mechanisms, and identify knowledge gaps for future research.

Indexed as

AllergensFood HypersensitivityAdministration, OralDesensitization, ImmunologicHumansAllergensantibodiesbasophilsB cellsdesensitizationimmune mechanismsmast cellsOral immunotherapysustained unresponsivenessT cells

Identifiers

PMID29288078
PMCPMC6939858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.