Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29287038›Full record

ArticleEar and hearing

Effects of Amplification on Neural Phase Locking, Amplitude, and Latency to a Speech Syllable.

Kimberly A Jenkins, Calli Fodor, Alessandro Presacco, Samira Anderson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Rate Discrimination Training May Partially Restore Temporal Processing Abilities from Age-Related Deficits.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Neural and behavioral changes after the use of hearing aids.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2018
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Neural Plasticity Induced by Hearing Aid Use.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Age Effects on Neural Representation and Perception of Silence Duration Cues in Speech.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kimberly A JenkinsDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Calli FodorDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Alessandro PresaccoDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Samira AndersonDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
University of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

COMPARATIVE AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY OF HEARINGT32DC000046 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI Catherine Emily Carr, Matthew J. Goupell · 1994 to 2026
$7.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOlder adults often have trouble adjusting to hearing aids when they start wearing them for the first time. Probe microphone measurements verify appropriate levels of amplification up to the tympanic membrane. Little is known, however, about the effects of amplification on auditory-evoked responses to speech stimuli during initial hearing aid use. The present study assesses the effects of amplification on neural encoding of a speech signal in older adults using hearing aids for the first time. It was hypothesized that amplification results in improved stimulus encoding (higher amplitudes, improved phase locking, and earlier latencies), with greater effects for the regions of the signal that are less audible.

designThirty-seven adults, aged 60 to 85 years with mild to severe sensorineural hearing loss and no prior hearing aid use, were bilaterally fit with Widex Dream 440 receiver-in-the-ear hearing aids. Probe microphone measures were used to adjust the gain of the hearing aids and verify the fitting. Unaided and aided frequency-following responses and cortical auditory-evoked potentials to the stimulus /ga/ were recorded in sound field over the course of 2 days for three conditions: 65 dB SPL and 80 dB SPL in quiet, and 80 dB SPL in six-talker babble (+10 signal to noise ratio).

resultsResponses from midbrain were analyzed in the time regions corresponding to the consonant transition (18 to 68 ms) and the steady state vowel (68 to 170 ms). Generally, amplification increased phase locking and amplitude and decreased latency for the region and presentation conditions that had lower stimulus amplitudes-the transition region and 65 dB SPL level. Responses from cortex showed decreased latency for P1, but an unexpected decrease in N1 amplitude. Previous studies have demonstrated an exaggerated cortical representation of speech in older adults compared to younger adults, possibly because of an increase in neural resources necessary to encode the signal. Therefore, a decrease in N1 amplitude with amplification and with increased presentation level may suggest that amplification decreases the neural resources necessary for cortical encoding.

conclusionIncreased phase locking and amplitude and decreased latency in midbrain suggest that amplification may improve neural representation of the speech signal in new hearing aid users. The improvement with amplification was also found in cortex, and, in particular, decreased P1 latencies and lower N1 amplitudes may indicate greater neural efficiency. Further investigations will evaluate changes in subcortical and cortical responses during the first 6 months of hearing aid use.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, AuditoryHearing AidsAgedAged, 80 and overEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemFemaleHearing Loss, SensorineuralHumansMaleMiddle AgedSignal-To-Noise Ratio

Identifiers

PMID29287038
PMCPMC6014864
OpenAlexW2778321371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.