ArticleEar and hearing
Effects of Amplification on Neural Phase Locking, Amplitude, and Latency to a Speech Syllable.
Article in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rate Discrimination Training May Partially Restore Temporal Processing Abilities from Age-Related Deficits.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022Trial
- Restoration of sensory input may improve cognitive and neural function.Neuropsychologia · 2018Trial
- Neural and behavioral changes after the use of hearing aids.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2018Trial
- Effect of digital noise reduction processing on subcortical speech encoding and relationship to behavioral outcomes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Effect of digital noise-reduction processing on subcortical speech encoding and relationship to behavioral outcomes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Effects of aging and hearing loss on perceptual and electrophysiological measures of pulse-rate discrimination.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022Article
- Neural Plasticity Induced by Hearing Aid Use.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
- Enhanced brainstem phase-locking in low-level noise reveals stochastic resonance in the frequency-following response (FFR).Brain research · 2021Review
- Peripheral deficits and phase-locking declines in aging adults.Hearing research · 2021Article
- Impact of hearing aid noise reduction algorithms on the speech-evoked auditory brainstem response.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Predicting and Weighting the Factors Affecting Workers' Hearing Loss Based on Audiometric Data Using C5 Algorithm.Annals of global health · 2019Article
- Age Effects on Neural Representation and Perception of Silence Duration Cues in Speech.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2019Article
- Effects of Age, Cognition, and Neural Encoding on the Perception of Temporal Speech Cues.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
- Speech Auditory Brainstem Responses in Adult Hearing Aid Users: Effects of Aiding and Background Noise, and Prediction of Behavioral Measures.Trends in hearingArticle
- Predicting Hearing aid Benefit Using Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses in Children With Hearing Loss.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveOlder adults often have trouble adjusting to hearing aids when they start wearing them for the first time. Probe microphone measurements verify appropriate levels of amplification up to the tympanic membrane. Little is known, however, about the effects of amplification on auditory-evoked responses to speech stimuli during initial hearing aid use. The present study assesses the effects of amplification on neural encoding of a speech signal in older adults using hearing aids for the first time. It was hypothesized that amplification results in improved stimulus encoding (higher amplitudes, improved phase locking, and earlier latencies), with greater effects for the regions of the signal that are less audible.
designThirty-seven adults, aged 60 to 85 years with mild to severe sensorineural hearing loss and no prior hearing aid use, were bilaterally fit with Widex Dream 440 receiver-in-the-ear hearing aids. Probe microphone measures were used to adjust the gain of the hearing aids and verify the fitting. Unaided and aided frequency-following responses and cortical auditory-evoked potentials to the stimulus /ga/ were recorded in sound field over the course of 2 days for three conditions: 65 dB SPL and 80 dB SPL in quiet, and 80 dB SPL in six-talker babble (+10 signal to noise ratio).
resultsResponses from midbrain were analyzed in the time regions corresponding to the consonant transition (18 to 68 ms) and the steady state vowel (68 to 170 ms). Generally, amplification increased phase locking and amplitude and decreased latency for the region and presentation conditions that had lower stimulus amplitudes-the transition region and 65 dB SPL level. Responses from cortex showed decreased latency for P1, but an unexpected decrease in N1 amplitude. Previous studies have demonstrated an exaggerated cortical representation of speech in older adults compared to younger adults, possibly because of an increase in neural resources necessary to encode the signal. Therefore, a decrease in N1 amplitude with amplification and with increased presentation level may suggest that amplification decreases the neural resources necessary for cortical encoding.
conclusionIncreased phase locking and amplitude and decreased latency in midbrain suggest that amplification may improve neural representation of the speech signal in new hearing aid users. The improvement with amplification was also found in cortex, and, in particular, decreased P1 latencies and lower N1 amplitudes may indicate greater neural efficiency. Further investigations will evaluate changes in subcortical and cortical responses during the first 6 months of hearing aid use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.