Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29287029›Full record

SynthesisJournal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)2018

Retention in HIV Care During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period in the Option B+ Era: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies in Africa.

Brandon A Knettel, Cody Cichowitz, James Samwel Ngocho, Elizabeth T Knippler, Lilian N Chumba, Blandina T Mmbaga, Melissa H Watt

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 161 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
161citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

161 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 226 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

101 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Brandon A KnettelDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Cody CichowitzDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC.
James Samwel NgochoKilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania.
Elizabeth T KnipplerDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Lilian N ChumbaDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Blandina T MmbagaDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Melissa H WattDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Duke University · USJohns Hopkins University · USKilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre · TZ

Funding

Social and Behavioral Sciences CoreP30AI064518 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Nwora Lance Okeke · 2005 to 2026
$50.5M
Sociobehavioral Sciences Research to Improve Care for HIV Infection in TanzaniaD43TW009595 · FIC · KILIMANJARO CHRISTIAN MEDICAL CENTRE · PI Blandina Theophil Mmbaga · 2013 to 2026
$4.2M
Strengthening of Research Capacity for Junior Faculty in TanzaniaD43TW010138 · FIC · KILIMANJARO CHRISTIAN MEDICAL COLLEGE · PI MTETA, ALFRED KIEN · 2015 to 2020
$3.2M
Postpartum HIV care engagement in the context of Option B+ in TanzaniaR21AI124344 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MMBAGA, BLANDINA THEOPHIL, WATT, MELISSA H · 2016 to 2017
$314k
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009595FIC NIH HHS D43 TW010138NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI064518NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI124344
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnder Option B+ guidelines for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV, pregnant and breastfeeding women initiate antiretroviral therapy for lifelong use. The objectives of this study were: (1) to synthesize data on retention in care over time in option B+ programs in Africa, and (2) to identify factors associated with retention in care.

methodsPubMed, EMBASE, and African Index Medicus were systematically searched from January 2012 to June 2017. Pooled estimates of the proportion of women retained were generated and factors associated with retention were analyzed thematically.

resultsThirty-five articles were included in the final review; 22 reported retention rates (n = 60,890) and 25 reported factors associated with retention. Pooled estimates of retention were 72.9% (95% confidence interval: 66.4% to 78.9%) at 6 months for studies reporting <12 months of follow-up and 76.4% (95% confidence interval: 69.0% to 83.1%) at 12 months for studies reporting ≥12 months of follow-up. Data on undocumented clinic transfers were largely absent. Risk factors for poor retention included younger age, initiating antiretroviral therapy on the same day as diagnosis, initiating during pregnancy versus breastfeeding, and initiating late in the pregnancy. Retention was compromised by stigma, fear of disclosure, and lack of social support.

conclusionsRetention rates in prevention of mother-to-child transmission under option B+ were below those of the general adult population, necessitating interventions targeting the complex circumstances of women initiating care under option B+. Improved and standardized procedures to track and report retention are needed to accurately represent care engagement and capture undocumented transfers within the health system.

Indexed as

Medication AdherenceAfricaAge FactorsAnti-Retroviral AgentsFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalPostpartum PeriodPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousRisk FactorsAnti-Retroviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID29287029
PMCPMC5844830
OpenAlexW2777019505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.