Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29286918›Full record

ArticleCancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers2018

CD9 expression indicates a poor outcome in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Peiqi Liang, Miao Miao, Zhuogang Liu, Hongtao Wang, Wei Jiang, Shiyu Ma, Chuan Li, Rong Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Tissue Biomarkers Predicting Lymph Node Status in Cutaneous Melanoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Rac GTPases in Hematological Malignancies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Peiqi Liang
Miao Miao
Zhuogang Liu
Hongtao Wang
Wei Jiang
Shiyu Ma
Chuan Li
Rong Hu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe undertook a single-center retrospective study to determine the relationship between CD9 and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). MATERIALS AND

methodsIn total, 112 newly diagnosed patients in our center were enrolled in the study. Their clinical information was collected and the patients werefollowed over the course of the study. Flow cytometry was used to detect the expression of CD9.

resultsCD9 expression was more common in B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and patients > 40 years old. CD9-positive patients exhibited a higher BCR-ABL fusion gene positive rate and higher neutrophil counts than CD9 negative patients (P= 0.004 and P= 0.004, respectively). Response to induction chemotherapy was not dependent on CD9 expression. CD9-positive patients had a lower 2-year overall survival rate than CD9-negative patients.

conclusionCD9 expression predicts some clinical characteristics and indicates an unfavorable prognosis in ALL patients.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesTetraspanin 29Biomarkers, TumorCD9 protein, humanTetraspanin 29Acute lymphoblastic leukemiaCD9clinical characteristicsprognosis

Identifiers

PMID29286918
PMCPMC13078320
OpenAlexW2777877780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.