Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29286779›Full record

ArticlePhysical review letters2017

Sequence-Dependent Persistence Length of Long DNA.

Hui-Min Chuang, Jeffrey G Reifenberger, Han Cao, Kevin D Dorfman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical review letters, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Phosphorylated CtIP bridges DNA to promote annealing of broken ends.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Building machines with DNA molecules.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hui-Min ChuangDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 421 Washington Avenue SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
Jeffrey G ReifenbergerBioNano Genomics, 9640 Towne Centre Drive, Suite 100, San Diego, California 92121, USA.
Han CaoBioNano Genomics, 9640 Towne Centre Drive, Suite 100, San Diego, California 92121, USA.
Kevin D DorfmanDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 421 Washington Avenue SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.

Funding

Dynamics of DNA Barcoding in NanochannelsR01HG006851 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI DORFMAN, KEVIN D · 2013 to 2018
$2.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG006851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using a high-throughput genome-mapping approach, we obtained circa 50 million measurements of the extension of internal human DNA segments in a 41  nm×41  nm nanochannel. The underlying DNA sequences, obtained by mapping to the reference human genome, are 2.5-393 kilobase pairs long and contain percent GC contents between 32.5% and 60%. Using Odijk's theory for a channel-confined wormlike chain, these data reveal that the DNA persistence length increases by almost 20% as the percent GC content increases. The increased persistence length is rationalized by a model, containing no adjustable parameters, that treats the DNA as a statistical terpolymer with a sequence-dependent intrinsic persistence length and a sequence-independent electrostatic persistence length.

Indexed as

Models, ChemicalModels, GeneticBase SequenceDNAHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansStructure-Activity RelationshipDNA

Identifiers

PMID29286779
PMCPMC5839665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.