Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29286532›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2018

Semiparametric estimation of the accelerated mean model with panel count data under informative examination times.

Sy Han Chiou, Gongjun Xu, Jun Yan, Chiung-Yu Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Semiparametric Regression Analysis of Panel Count Data: A Practical Review.International statistical review = Revue internationale de statistique · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sy Han ChiouDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0003-2672-662X
Gongjun XuDepartment of Statistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, U.S.A.
Jun YanDepartment of Statistics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, U.S.A.
Chiung-Yu HuangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94158, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0003-2313-3562

Funding

Training in Neurostatistics and NeuroepidemiologyT32NS048005 · NINDS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI ONNELA, JUKKA-PEKKA · 2004 to 2018
$3.2M
Statistical Methods for Survival and Recurrent Event Data in Clinical ResearchR01CA193888 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HUANG, CHIUNG-YU · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA193888NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS048005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Panel count data arise when the number of recurrent events experienced by each subject is observed intermittently at discrete examination times. The examination time process can be informative about the underlying recurrent event process even after conditioning on covariates. We consider a semiparametric accelerated mean model for the recurrent event process and allow the two processes to be correlated through a shared frailty. The regression parameters have a simple marginal interpretation of modifying the time scale of the cumulative mean function of the event process. A novel estimation procedure for the regression parameters and the baseline rate function is proposed based on a conditioning technique. In contrast to existing methods, the proposed method is robust in the sense that it requires neither the strong Poisson-type assumption for the underlying recurrent event process nor a parametric assumption on the distribution of the unobserved frailty. Moreover, the distribution of the examination time process is left unspecified, allowing for arbitrary dependence between the two processes. Asymptotic consistency of the estimator is established, and the variance of the estimator is estimated by a model-based smoothed bootstrap procedure. Numerical studies demonstrated that the proposed point estimator and variance estimator perform well with practical sample sizes. The methods are applied to data from a skin cancer chemoprevention trial.

Indexed as

Time FactorsChemopreventionClinical Trials as TopicComputer SimulationRecurrenceRegression AnalysisSample SizeSkin NeoplasmsStatistics as TopicFrailtyModel-based bootstrapPoisson processRecurrent eventsScale-change modelSquared extrapolation method

Identifiers

PMID29286532
PMCPMC6026085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.