Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29286427›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2017

Live Imaging Followed by Single Cell Tracking to Monitor Cell Biology and the Lineage Progression of Multiple Neural Populations.

Rosa Gómez-Villafuertes, Lucía Paniagua-Herranz, Sergio Gascon, David de Agustín-Durán, María de la O Ferreras, Juan Carlos Gil-Redondo, María José Queipo, Aida Menendez-Mendez, Ráquel Pérez-Sen, Esmerilda G Delicado and 5 more

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Rosa Gómez-VillafuertesBiochemistry and Molecular Biology Department, Faculty of Veterinary medicine, Complutense University; University Institute for Neurochemistry Research (IUIN); Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC).
Lucía Paniagua-HerranzBiochemistry and Molecular Biology Department, Faculty of Veterinary medicine, Complutense University; University Institute for Neurochemistry Research (IUIN); Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC).
Sergio GasconInstitute of Stem Cell Research, Helmholtz Center Munich, Neuherberg/Munich, Germany Physiological Genomics, Biomedical Center, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich; Toxicology and Pharmacology Department, Faculty of Veterinary medicine, Complutense University.
David de Agustín-DuránBiochemistry and Molecular Biology Department, Faculty of Veterinary medicine, Complutense University; University Institute for Neurochemistry Research (IUIN); Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC).
María de la O FerrerasBiochemistry and Molecular Biology Department, Faculty of Veterinary medicine, Complutense University; University Institute for Neurochemistry Research (IUIN); Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC).
Juan Carlos Gil-RedondoBiochemistry and Molecular Biology Department, Faculty of Veterinary medicine, Complutense University; University Institute for Neurochemistry Research (IUIN); Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC).
María José QueipoBiochemistry and Molecular Biology Department, Faculty of Veterinary medicine, Complutense University; University Institute for Neurochemistry Research (IUIN); Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC).
Aida Menendez-MendezBiochemistry and Molecular Biology Department, Faculty of Veterinary medicine, Complutense University; University Institute for Neurochemistry Research (IUIN); Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC).
Ráquel Pérez-SenBiochemistry and Molecular Biology Department, Faculty of Veterinary medicine, Complutense University; University Institute for Neurochemistry Research (IUIN); Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC).
Esmerilda G DelicadoBiochemistry and Molecular Biology Department, Faculty of Veterinary medicine, Complutense University; University Institute for Neurochemistry Research (IUIN); Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC).
Javier GualixBiochemistry and Molecular Biology Department, Faculty of Veterinary medicine, Complutense University; University Institute for Neurochemistry Research (IUIN); Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC).
Marcos R CostaBrain Institute, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte.
Timm SchroederDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zurich.
María Teresa Miras-PortugalBiochemistry and Molecular Biology Department, Faculty of Veterinary medicine, Complutense University; University Institute for Neurochemistry Research (IUIN); Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC).
Felipe OrtegaBiochemistry and Molecular Biology Department, Faculty of Veterinary medicine, Complutense University; University Institute for Neurochemistry Research (IUIN); Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC); fortegao@ucm.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms that control critical biological events of neural cell populations, such as proliferation, differentiation, or cell fate decisions, will be crucial to design therapeutic strategies for many diseases affecting the nervous system. Current methods to track cell populations rely on their final outcomes in still images and they generally fail to provide sufficient temporal resolution to identify behavioral features in single cells. Moreover, variations in cell death, behavioral heterogeneity within a cell population, dilution, spreading, or the low efficiency of the markers used to analyze cells are all important handicaps that will lead to incomplete or incorrect read-outs of the results. Conversely, performing live imaging and single cell tracking under appropriate conditions represents a powerful tool to monitor each of these events. Here, a time-lapse video-microscopy protocol, followed by post-processing, is described to track neural populations with single cell resolution, employing specific software. The methods described enable researchers to address essential questions regarding the cell biology and lineage progression of distinct neural populations.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell BiologyCell DifferentiationCell LineageCell TrackingCytological TechniquesHumansMicroscopy, VideoMonitoring, PhysiologicNeuronsSingle-Cell Analysis

Identifiers

PMID29286427
PMCPMC5755616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.