Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29286211›Full record

ArticleJournal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine2018

Characterization of costal cartilage and its suitability as a cell source for articular cartilage tissue engineering.

Le W Huwe, Wendy E Brown, Jerry C Hu, Kyriacos A Athanasiou

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Costal cartilage mimics urate on DECT.Skeletal radiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The functionality and translatability of neocartilage constructs are improved with the combination of fluid-induced shear stress and bioactive factors.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Le W HuweAlign Technology, San Jose, CA, USA.
Wendy E BrownDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Jerry C HuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Kyriacos A AthanasiouDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5387-8405
University of California, Irvine · USAlign Technology (United States) · US

Funding

TMJ Disc RegenerationR01DE015038 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI ATHANASIOU, KYRIACOS A · 2004 to 2022
$6.1M
Self-assembling process in tissue engineering of articular cartilageR01AR067821 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI ATHANASIOU, KYRIACOS A · 2015 to 2019
$1.9M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR067821NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE015038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Costal cartilage is a promising donor source of chondrocytes to alleviate cell scarcity in articular cartilage tissue engineering. Limited knowledge exists, however, on costal cartilage characteristics. This study describes the characterization of costal cartilage and articular cartilage properties and compares neocartilage engineered with costal chondrocytes to native articular cartilage, all within a sheep model. Specifically, we (a) quantitatively characterized the properties of costal cartilage in comparison to patellofemoral articular cartilage, and (b) evaluated the quality of neocartilage derived from costal chondrocytes for potential use in articular cartilage regeneration. Ovine costal and articular cartilages from various topographical locations were characterized mechanically, biochemically, and histologically. Costal cartilage was stiffer in compression but softer and weaker in tension than articular cartilage. These differences were attributed to high amounts of glycosaminoglycans and mineralization and a low amount of collagen in costal cartilage. Compared to articular cartilage, costal cartilage was more densely populated with chondrocytes, rendering it an excellent chondrocyte source. In terms of tissue engineering, using the self-assembling process, costal chondrocytes formed articular cartilage-like neocartilage. Quantitatively compared via a functionality index, neocartilage achieved 55% of the medial condyle cartilage mechanical and biochemical properties. This characterization study highlighted the differences between costal and articular cartilages in native forms and demonstrated that costal cartilage is a valuable source of chondrocytes suitable for articular cartilage regeneration strategies.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCartilage, ArticularCostal CartilageSheepTensile StrengthTissue Engineeringalternative cell sourcearticular cartilage regenerationcartilage mechanical propertiescartilage tissue engineeringcostal cartilage characterizationpatellofemoral cartilage

Identifiers

PMID29286211
PMCPMC5948132
OpenAlexW2777913511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.