Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29285999›Full record

ArticleBosnian journal of basic medical sciences2018

The clinical characteristics and surgical approach of scar endometriosis: A case series of 14 women.

Faik Tatli, Orhan Gozeneli, Hacer Uyanikoglu, Ali Uzunkoy, Huseyin Cahit Yalcın, Abdullah Ozgonul, Osman Bardakci, Adnan Incebiyik, Muhammet Emin Guldur

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Spontaneous abdominal wall endometriosis: A case report.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. The diagnostic value of 3.0T MRI in cesarean scar pregnancy.American journal of translational research · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Abdominal wall endometriosis (a narrative review).International journal of medical sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Faik TatliDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Harran University, Sanliurfa, Turkey. faiktatli-@hotmail.com.
Orhan Gozeneli
Hacer Uyanikoglu
Ali Uzunkoy
Huseyin Cahit Yalcın
Abdullah Ozgonul
Osman Bardakci
Adnan Incebiyik
Muhammet Emin Guldur
Harran University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scar endometriosis, also referred to as abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE), is a rare form of endometriosis that usually develops in the scar after obstetric or gynecological surgeries, including cesarean section (CS). Recently, the occurrence of scar endometriosis has been increasing together with the increase of CS incidence. Scar endometriosis can be clinically misdiagnosed as hernia, lipoma, or hematoma. Here we retrospectively analyzed the clinical aspects of scar endometriosis and surgical approach in 14 patients from a tertiary hospital, who were treated by surgery, between 2012 and 2017. The mean age was 32.71 ± 8.61 years (range: 19-45). Palpable mass and cyclic pain at the scar site were the most common complaints. Twelve patients had previously undergone CS, and two patients had undergone a surgery of ovarian endometrioma. The preoperative diagnosis was determined with ultrasonography (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or computed tomography (CT). Preoperatively, scar endometriosis was diagnosed in 12/14 patients (85.7%), while 2 patients (14.3%) were diagnosed with inguinal hernia. The treatment was surgical excision in all patients; in addition, mesh repair surgery was performed in 1 patient with recurrent scar endometriosis. Postoperatively, endometriosis was confirmed by histology in all patients. The average size of endometriomas was 24.71 ± 6.67 mm (range: 11-35). No woman had concurrent pelvic endometriosis. In the follow-up period (mean: 9 months) the recurrence of endometriosis was not observed. Scar endometriosis should be considered in all women of reproductive age presenting with cyclic pain and swelling in their abdominal incision sites.

Indexed as

Abdominal WallAdultCesarean SectionCicatrixEndometriosisFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedPregnancyRetrospective StudiesTertiary Care CentersTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29285999
PMCPMC6087557
OpenAlexW2777309012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.