Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29285980›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurotrauma2018

Xenon Protects against Blast-Induced Traumatic Brain Injury in an In Vitro Model.

Rita Campos-Pires, Mariia Koziakova, Amina Yonis, Ashni Pau, Warren Macdonald, Katie Harris, Christopher J Edge, Nicholas P Franks, Peter F Mahoney, Robert Dickinson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurotrauma, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Experimental platforms to study blast injury.Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rita Campos-Pires1 Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care Section, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London , London, United Kingdom .
Mariia Koziakova1 Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care Section, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London , London, United Kingdom .
Amina Yonis1 Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care Section, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London , London, United Kingdom .
Ashni Pau1 Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care Section, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London , London, United Kingdom .
Warren Macdonald2 Royal British Legion Centre for Blast Injury Studies, Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London , London, United Kingdom .
Katie Harris1 Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care Section, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London , London, United Kingdom .
Christopher J Edge4 Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London , London, United Kingdom .
Nicholas P Franks4 Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London , London, United Kingdom .
Peter F Mahoney6 Royal Centre for Defence Medicine , Medical Directorate Joint Force Command, ICT Centre, Birmingham, United Kingdom .
Robert Dickinson1 Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care Section, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London , London, United Kingdom .
Imperial College London · GBBioengineering Center · RU

Funding

Medical Research Council G0901892Medical Research Council MC_PC_13064Medical Research Council MR/N027736/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the neuroprotective efficacy of the inert gas xenon as a treatment for patients with blast-induced traumatic brain injury in an in vitro laboratory model. We developed a novel blast traumatic brain injury model using C57BL/6N mouse organotypic hippocampal brain-slice cultures exposed to a single shockwave, with the resulting injury quantified using propidium iodide fluorescence. A shock tube blast generator was used to simulate open field explosive blast shockwaves, modeled by the Friedlander waveform. Exposure to blast shockwave resulted in significant (p < 0.01) injury that increased with peak-overpressure and impulse of the shockwave, and which exhibited a secondary injury development up to 72 h after trauma. Blast-induced propidium iodide fluorescence overlapped with cleaved caspase-3 immunofluorescence, indicating that shock-wave-induced cell death involves apoptosis. Xenon (50% atm) applied 1 h after blast exposure reduced injury 24 h (p < 0.01), 48 h (p < 0.05), and 72 h (p < 0.001) later, compared with untreated control injury. Xenon-treated injured slices were not significantly different from uninjured sham slices at 24 h and 72 h. We demonstrate for the first time that xenon treatment after blast traumatic brain injury reduces initial injury and prevents subsequent injury development in vitro. Our findings support the idea that xenon may be a potential first-line treatment for those with blast-induced traumatic brain injury.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlast InjuriesBrain Injuries, TraumaticDisease Models, AnimalHippocampusMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeuronsNeuroprotective AgentsOrgan Culture TechniquesXenonNeuroprotective AgentsXenonblast-induced neurotraumablast traumatic brain injuryneuroprotectionprimary blast injuryTBIxenon

Identifiers

PMID29285980
PMCPMC5899289
OpenAlexW2776816776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.