ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2018
Biobanks in the Era of Digital Medicine.
Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient views on research use of clinical data without consent: Legal, but also acceptable?European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2019Trial
- Connecting biospecimens and data: a scoping review-informed conceptual framework for digital infrastructure in biobanking and genomic research in low- and middle-income countries.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Current situation and future prospect of biobank.CytoJournal · 2026Review
- Analysis of Saposhnikoviae Radix and Libonotidis Radix Based on "Characteristic Ion Set" and Chemometrics.Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS · 2025Article
- Review
- Editorial: Current Status and Future Challenges of Biobank Data Analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Biobanking in the digital pathology era.Oncology research · 2021Article
- Biobanks-A Platform for Scientific and Biomedical Research.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- SCALEUS-FD: A FAIR Data Tool for Biomedical Applications.BioMed research international · 2020Article
- Specimen Collection for Translational Studies in Hidradenitis Suppurativa.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digitalization is currently permeating virtually all sectors of modern societies, including biomedical research and medical care. At the same time, biobanks engaged in the long-term storage of biological samples that are fit for purpose have become key drivers in both fields. The present article highlights some of the challenges and opportunities that biobanking is facing in the current proverbial "era of digitalization."
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.