Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29285597›Full record

ReviewTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2018

Interspecific and intergeneric hybridization as a source of variation for wheat grain quality improvement.

Juan B Alvarez, Carlos Guzmán

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Intergeneric hybridization of marguerite (Plant biotechnology (Tokyo, Japan) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The karyotype ofMolecular cytogenetics · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Juan B AlvarezDepartamento de Genética, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica y de Montes, Edificio Gregor Mendel, Campus de Rabanales, Universidad de Córdoba, CeiA3, 14071, Córdoba, Spain. jb.alvarez@uco.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7036-1317
Carlos GuzmánCIMMYT, Global Wheat Program, Km 45 Carretera México-Veracruz, El Batán, C.P. 56130, Texcoco, Estado de México, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1797-9273

Funding

Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness, co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER) from the European Union AGL2014-52445-R
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageThe hybridization events with wild relatives and old varieties are an alternative source for enlarging the wheat quality variability. This review describes these process and their effects on the technological and nutritional quality. Wheat quality and its end-uses are mainly based on variation in three traits: grain hardness, gluten quality and starch. In recent times, the importance of nutritional quality and health-related aspects has increased the range of these traits with the inclusion of other grain components such as vitamins, fibre and micronutrients. One option to enlarge the genetic variability in wheat for all these components has been the use of wild relatives, together with underutilised or neglected wheat varieties or species. In the current review, we summarise the role of each grain component in relation to grain quality, their variation in modern wheat and the alternative sources in which wheat breeders have found novel variation.

Indexed as

Hybridization, GeneticNutritive ValueEdible GrainGlutensPlant BreedingStarchTriticumGlutensStarch

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.