Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29285572›Full record

ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2017

Characteristics and diagnoses of acute headache in pregnant women - a retrospective cross-sectional study.

Bianca Raffaelli, Eberhard Siebert, Jeannette Körner, Thomas Liman, Uwe Reuter, Lars Neeb

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Acta medica Lituanic · 2021
    Article
  11. Secondary Headaches During Pregnancy: When to Worry.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2019
    Review
  12. The Hypertensive Headache: a Review.Current pain and headache reports · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bianca RaffaelliDepartment of Neurology with Experimental Neurology- Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Eberhard SiebertInstitute of Neuroradiology - Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Jeannette KörnerDepartment of Neurology with Experimental Neurology- Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Thomas LimanDepartment of Neurology with Experimental Neurology- Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Uwe ReuterDepartment of Neurology with Experimental Neurology- Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Lars NeebDepartment of Neurology with Experimental Neurology- Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. lars.neeb@charite.de.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute headache is one of the most frequent neurological symptoms in pregnant women. The early diagnosis of underlying secondary conditions has a major influence on patient outcome, especially in emergency settings. However, at the time being no well-established guideline for diagnostic evaluation of acute headache during pregnancy exists. In this study, we aimed to characterize acute headache in pregnant women concerning demographic, clinical, and diagnostic features, and to determine predictors of secondary headache.

methodsWe analysed retrospectively the data of 151 pregnant women receiving neurological consultation due to acute headache at the Charité Berlin between 2010 and 2016. To assess risk factors for secondary headache in these patients we compared multiple anamnestic and clinical features of the primary and secondary headache group.

results57.6% of the patients were diagnosed with primary headache, most common migraine and tension type headache. Concerning secondary headaches, the most common aetiologies were infections (29.7%) and hypertensive disorders (22.0%). The primary and secondary headache group were similar in most anamnestic and clinical features. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, secondary headache history [OR 6.6; 95% CI 1.3-33.1], elevated blood pressure [OR 7.2; 95% CI 2.3-22.6], fever [OR 12.1; 95% CI 1.3-111.0] and abnormal neurological examination [OR 9.9; 95% CI 2.7-36.3] represented independent predictors for secondary headache. Regarding additional diagnostic procedures, abnormal thrombocytes, GOT, GPT and CRP, proteinuria, pathologic results of lumbar puncture and neuroimaging were associated with secondary headache.

conclusionsSecondary headache disorders are common during pregnancy, occurring in over one third of acute headache cases receiving neurological consultation. Most anamnestic and clinical features may not allow a clear distinction between primary and secondary headaches. Clinicians should pay attention to the presence of secondary headache history, elevated blood pressure, fever and abnormal findings in the neurological examination. Additional investigations, including laboratory tests and neuroimaging, are essential for the diagnostic process.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHeadacheHeadache Disorders, SecondaryHumansMigraine DisordersNeurologic ExaminationPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTension-Type HeadacheClinical featuresHeadachePregnancyRed flagsSecondary headache

Identifiers

PMID29285572
PMCPMC5745375
OpenAlexW2774580319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.