ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2018
Adoption of Electronic Health Records and Perceptions of Financial and Clinical Outcomes Among Ophthalmologists in the United States.
Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Understanding Primary Care Physicians' Comprehension of Eye Care Notes to Improve Diabetes Care Coordination.Research square · 2026Article
- Inefficacy of Longitudinal Cup-to-Disc Ratio Measurements in Identifying Glaucoma Progression.American journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Social determinants of health and health disparities in glaucoma: A review.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2024Review
- Value of Electronic Health Records Measured Using Financial and Clinical Outcomes: Quantitative Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- ChatGPT in ophthalmology: the dawn of a new era?Eye (London, England) · 2024Article
- Advancing Toward a Common Data Model in Ophthalmology: Gap Analysis of General Eye Examination Concepts to Standard Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Concepts.Ophthalmology science · 2023Article
- Visual Acuity: Assessment of Data Quality and Usability in an Electronic Health Record System.Ophthalmology science · 2023Article
- Using Electronic Clinical Decision Support to Examine Vision Rehabilitation Referrals and Practice Guidelines in Ophthalmology.Translational vision science & technology · 2022Article
- The Value of Electronic Health Records Since the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act: Systematic Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2022Review
- Applications of natural language processing in ophthalmology: present and future.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Multicenter Analysis of Electronic Health Record Use among Ophthalmologists.Ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Effects of Electronic Health Record Implementation and Barriers to Adoption and Use: A Scoping Review and Qualitative Analysis of the Content.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Electronic Health Record Use among Ophthalmology Residents while on Call.Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017) · 2020Article
- Comments on: Back to the Bedside.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2020Article
- Electronic medical records - The good, the bad and the ugly.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2020Article
- Electronic Health Records in Ophthalmology: Source and Method of Documentation.American journal of ophthalmology · 2020Article
- Hospital Characteristics Associated with Certified EHR Adoption among US Psychiatric Hospitals.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2020Article
- Promoting Quality Face-to-Face Communication during Ophthalmology Encounters in the Electronic Health Record Era.Applied clinical informatics · 2020Article
- Natural Language Processing to Quantify Microbial Keratitis Measurements.Ophthalmology · 2019Article
- Time Requirements of Paper-Based Clinical Workflows and After-Hours Documentation in a Multispecialty Academic Ophthalmology Practice.American journal of ophthalmology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Assessing the rate of electronic health record (EHR) adoption and ophthalmologists' perceptions on financial and clinical productivity is important in understanding how to direct future design and health care policy. Objective: To assess adoption rate and perceptions of financial and clinical outcomes of EHRs among ophthalmologists in the United States. Design, Setting, and Participants: Population-based, cross-sectional study. A random sample of 2000 ophthalmologists was generated on the basis of mailing address zip codes from the 2015 American Academy of Ophthalmology US active membership database, which included more than 18 000 ophthalmologists. A survey was sent by email to assess adoption rate of EHRs, perceptions of financial and clinical productivity, and engagement with Medicare and Medicaid programs that incentivize the use of EHRs. The survey was conducted between 2015 and 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures: Adoption rate of EHRs and perceptions of financial and clinical productivity. Results: The adoption rate of EHRs among surveyed ophthalmologists (348 respondents) was 72.1%. The responding ophthalmologists perceived that their net revenues and productivity have declined and that practice costs are higher with EHR use. Of those who attested for stage 1 of the EHR incentive program, 83% had already or were planning to attest to stage 2, but 9% had no plans. Conclusions and Relevance: The adoption of EHRs by ophthalmologists has more than doubled since a 2011 survey and is similar to that of primary care physicians (79%). In comparison with 2 previous surveys of ophthalmologists, respondents had more negative perceptions of EHR productivity outcomes and effect on practice costs, although financial data were not collected in this survey to support these opinions. These negative perceptions suggest that more attention should be placed on improving the efficiency and usability of EHR systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.