ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2018
Paradoxical response to osimertinib therapy in a patient with T790M-mutated lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Osimertinib-induced rapid regression of large metastatic tumor to the pituitary in a patient with lung adenocarcinoma.Surgical neurology international · 2021Article
- EGFR T790M-Positive Lung Adenocarcinoma Metastases to the Pituitary Gland Causing Adrenal Insufficiency: A Case Report.Case reports in oncological medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 'paradoxical response' to cancer treatment is a term used to describe the emergence of unexpected new lesions and the progression of existing lesions, despite appropriate and effective therapy. 'Pseudo-progression' is a phenomenon in which lymphocytes activated by an immune checkpoint inhibitor accumulate in a tumor and expand its shadow, mimicking enlargement of the primary lesion or development of a new metastatic lesion. Patients receiving cancer chemotherapy may respond differently to treatment, by exhibiting a response, deterioration, or the simultaneous occurrence of both. These variations may be attributed to the heterogeneity of the cancer. However, differences in the temporary response to epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) treatment are rarely observed. If such a phenomenon is observed, it should not affect the evaluation of the therapeutic effect or be considered as an indication for the discontinuation of treatment. We herein report a rare case of a transient increase in carcinomatous pleural fluid as a paradoxical response to osimertinib treatment in a patient with T790M-mutated lung adenocarcinoma. The primary lesion and pulmonary metastases responded well to therapy. Although this paradoxical response is very rare, of non-malignant nature, and does not usually require treatment modification of, physicians must acknowledge that it is not a clinically discouraging characteristic when using EGFR-TKI to treat T790M-mutated lung adenocarcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.