Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29285384›Full record

ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2017

The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin as second-line chemotherapy can be a preferred regimen for patients with urothelial carcinoma after the failure of gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy.

Nobuki Furubayashi, Takahito Negishi, Takuya Yamashita, Shuhei Kusano, Kenichi Taguchi, Mototsugu Shimokawa, Motonobu Nakamura

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nobuki FurubayashiDepartment of Urology, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Fukuoka 811-1395, Japan.
Takahito NegishiDepartment of Urology, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Fukuoka 811-1395, Japan.
Takuya YamashitaDepartment of Urology, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Fukuoka 811-1395, Japan.
Shuhei KusanoDepartment of Urology, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Fukuoka 811-1395, Japan.
Kenichi TaguchiDepartment of Pathology, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Fukuoka 811-1395, Japan.
Mototsugu ShimokawaInstitute for Clinical Research, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Fukuoka 811-1395, Japan.
Motonobu NakamuraDepartment of Urology, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Fukuoka 811-1395, Japan.
National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is no established standard second-line chemotherapy after the failure of the first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy for patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. With regards to second-line chemotherapy, methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (MVAC) was used from July 2009 onwards, and paclitaxel and carboplatin (TC) was introduced in April 2014 at the National Kyushu Cancer Center. The present study aimed to assess the prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in second-line treatment that included best supportive care (BSC), and the tolerability and efficacy of TC chemotherapy. In total, 52 patients who were confirmed to have disease progression with first-line gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) between June 2009 and November 2016 were enrolled in the current study. In addition, 28 patients selected BSC as second-line treatment, while 24 patients received second-line chemotherapy (MVAC, n=8; TC, n=16). The median OS for BSC, MVAC and TC was 2.8, 5.4, and 12.7 months, respectively. The difference between BSC and MVAC was not statistically significant (P=0.596). However, the difference between BSC and TC was statistically significant after Bonferroni correction (P=0.002). Multivariate analyses revealed that anemia [hazard ratio (HR), 7.047; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.553-35.636; P=0.011], the presence of visceral metastasis (HR, 4.174; 95% CI, 1.506-13.429; P=0.005) and second-line treatment (TC HR, 0.296; 95% CI, 0.124-0.636; P=0.003) were independent prognostic factors. TC achieved an 18.7% overall response rate and a 56.2% disease control rate. Myelosuppression was the most common grade ≥3 toxicity, but no treatment-associated mortalities occurred during the study period. TC was associated with favorable benefits and safety, and may be considered a preferred regimen after the failure of GC.

Indexed as

gemcitabine and cisplatinoverall survivalpaclitaxel and carboplatinsecond-line chemotherapyurothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID29285384
PMCPMC5740837
OpenAlexW2764223370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.