Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29285365›Full record

ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2017

Dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma: A report of three cases and review of the literature.

Ryo Yokomizo, Kyosuke Yamada, Yasushi Iida, Takako Kiyokawa, Kazu Ueda, Motoaki Saito, Nozomu Yanaihara, Mayo Nakamura, Aikou Okamoto

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Interobserver diagnostic reproducibility in advanced-stage endometrial carcinoma.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ryo YokomizoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan.
Kyosuke YamadaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan.
Yasushi IidaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan.
Takako KiyokawaDepartment of Pathology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan.
Kazu UedaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan.
Motoaki SaitoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan.
Nozomu YanaiharaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan.
Mayo NakamuraDepartment of Pathology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan.
Aikou OkamotoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan.
Jikei University School of Medicine · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma, which is defined microscopically as the co-existence of undifferentiated carcinoma and grade 1 or 2 endometrioid adenocarcinoma, is an aggressive type of cancer regardless of the percentage of undifferentiated components. It is reported that undifferentiated carcinoma comprises 9% of endometrial carcinoma. The percentage of dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma has been hypothesized to be 40% of undifferentiated carcinoma. A precise pathological diagnosis is essential for defining the appropriate therapeutic approach and prognosis. Furthermore, since there is an association between dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma and Lynch syndrome, it is important to identify the patient's genetic background. The current case report presents three cases of dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma treated in our hospital. In immunohistochemical staining for DNA mismatch-repair (MMR) proteins in dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma, the components of undifferentiated carcinoma demonstrated a loss of MMR protein expression, and it is suspected that there may be a germline mutation in these cases. Therefore, Lynch syndrome should be suspected and the appropriate genetic approaches in cases of dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma should be considered.

Indexed as

dedifferentiated endometrial carcinomaimmunohistochemical stainingLynch syndromemismatch-repairundifferentiated endometrial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID29285365
PMCPMC5740830
OpenAlexW2760857508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.