Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29285233›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

AIO LQ-0110: a randomized phase II trial comparing oral doxycycline versus local administration of erythromycin as preemptive treatment strategies of panitumumab-mediated skin toxicity in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Melanie Kripp, Nicole Prasnikar, Ursula Vehling-Kaiser, Julia Quidde, Salah-Eddin Al-Batran, Alexander Stein, Kai Neben, Carla Verena Hannig, Hans Werner Tessen, Tanja Trarbach and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Melanie Kripp *Medizinische Klinik 3, Hämatologie und Onkologie, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Nicole Prasnikar *Hämatologie, Internistische Onkologie und Palliativmedizin, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany.
Ursula Vehling-KaiserTagesklinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie, Palliativmedizin, Landshut, Germany.
Julia QuiddeUniversitäres Cancer Center, UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Salah-Eddin Al-BatranUniversitäres Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen, Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany.
Alexander SteinUniversitäres Cancer Center, UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Kai NebenMedizinische Klinik II, Klinikum Mittelbaden, Baden-Baden, Germany.
Carla Verena HannigOnkologisches Gemeinschaftspraxis, Bottrop/Dorsten, Germany.
Hans Werner TessenOnkologische Kooperation Harz, Goslar, Germany.
Tanja TrarbachZentrum für Tumorbiologie und Integrative Medizin, Klinikum Wilhelmshaven, Wilhelmshaven, Germany.
Axel HinkeWiSP Wissenschaftlicher Service Pharma GmbH, Langenfeld, Germany.
Ralf-Dieter HofheinzInterdisziplinäres Tumorzentrum, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
University Hospital Heidelberg · DEAsklepios Klinik Barmbek · DEKlinikum Mittelbaden · DEKlinikum Wilhelmshaven · DEKrankenhaus Nordwest · DEPraxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity Cancer Center Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDermatologic toxicities, especially akne-like skin rash, are the most common side-effects associated with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy. Preemptive treatment with oral tetracyclines is recommended as a standard. Topical prophylactic options have thus far not been compared to tetracyclines. In the current study, we sought to establish an alternative topical treatment. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn this multicentre, randomized, open-label phase II study patients with (K)Ras-wildtype colorectal cancer receiving panitumumab were randomized (1:1) to receive either doxycycline 100 mg b.i.d. (standard arm) or erythromycin ointment 2% followed by doxycycline in case of insufficient activity. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients developing no skin toxicity ≥ grade 2 at any time during the first 8 weeks of panitumumab treatment. Skin toxicity was assessed using the NCI CTCAE v 4.0. Secondary endpoints comprised the assessment of skin toxicity using a more thorough grading system (WoMo score), evaluation of skin-related (DLQI) and global quality of life (EORTC QLQ C30).

resultsIn total, 88 patients were included in this trial. 69% of the patients in the erythromycin arm suffered from skin toxicity of grade ≥ 2 versus 63% in the standard arm (

conclusionsBased on this data erythromycin cannot be regarded as an alternative to doxycycline as prevention of EGFR-related skin toxicity.

Indexed as

doxycyclineerythromycinpanitumumabskin toxicityWoMo score

Identifiers

PMID29285233
PMCPMC5739620
OpenAlexW2760429531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.