Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29284760›Full record

ReviewThe oncologist2018

The Concept of Biosimilars: From Characterization to Evolution-A Narrative Review.

Fadi Farhat, Alfredo Torres, Wungki Park, Gilberto de Lima Lopes, Raja Mudad, Chukwuemeka Ikpeazu, Simon Abi Aad

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The oncologist, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Anti-VEGF and Other Novel Therapies for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: An Update.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Clinical and Regulatory Concerns of Biosimilars: A Review of Literature.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Biosimilars in dermatology: The wind of change.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A bibliometric analysis of the global research on biosimilars.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fadi FarhatDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, Hammoud Hospital University Medical Center, Saida, Lebanon drfadi.clinic@gmail.com.
Alfredo TorresDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, University of Miami-Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, Florida, USA.
Wungki ParkDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, University of Miami-Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, Florida, USA.
Gilberto de Lima LopesDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, University of Miami-Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, Florida, USA.
Raja MudadDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, University of Miami-Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, Florida, USA.
Chukwuemeka IkpeazuDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, University of Miami-Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, Florida, USA.
Simon Abi AadDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, University of Miami-Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, Florida, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biologic agents are currently the fastest emerging segment of drug expenditure. Unlike chemically synthesized small-molecule drugs, biologics are more complex, medicinal products produced by a living organism. They have become part of the standard of care in the treatment of a large variety of diseases, such as growth disorders, autoimmune diseases, cancer, cardiovascular illnesses, hemophilia, and rare genetic conditions, to name a few. Biosimilars, which are copies of biologics that are highly similar, were introduced in the market with an aim to offer efficacy that is not clinically different from the originator or reference product, at lower prices. We aim to clarify the concept of biosimilar, from definitions, history, market entry, challenges faced, and future evolution. For that purpose, we performed a literature search on the sites of the medicines regulatory agencies and PubMed from 1990 to 2014 with the keywords "biosimilars," "market," and "regulatory." In 2006, the first biosimilar, somatropin [rDNA origin], was marketed and led the way for biosimilar drug manufacturing. As a result, manufacturers have entered a diversified competition, facing challenges in manufacturing these complex agents, such as immunogenicity and efficiency. Biosimilars are set to evolve differently in various markets, namely the U.S., Japan, the European Union, and the "pharmerging" economies. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This article highlights the importance of biosimilars, as a cost-cutting strategy, in the delivery of state-of-the-art health care in developing countries, at a fraction of what a reference biological agent would cost.

Indexed as

Biosimilar PharmaceuticalsDrug DevelopmentDrug IndustryHealth Care CostsHumansInternationalityQuality of Health CareBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsBiologic agentsBiosimilarsChallengesMarket

Identifiers

PMID29284760
PMCPMC5905681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.