ArticleBMJ open2017
Comprehensive overview of computer-based health information tailoring: a scoping review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The autonomy of sport concept: a scoping review.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Pooled it
- In pursuit of increasing the application of tele-audiology in South Africa: COVID-19 puts on the alert for patient site facilitator training.The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings · 2022Pooled it
- Elements of social accountability in undergraduate health sciences curricula: A scoping review.The South African journal of physiotherapy · 2026Review
- In Silico Evaluation of Algorithm-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Implementing advance care planning in palliative and end of life care: a scoping review of community nursing perspectives.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Cochleovestibular findings linked to COVID-19: A scoping review for clinical care planning in South Africa.The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings · 2022Article
- Student-Led Clinics in Aotearoa New Zealand: A Scoping Review with Stakeholder Consultation.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2021Article
- Methods for the health technology assessment of complex interventions: a protocol for a scoping review.BMJ open · 2020Article
- Protocol for a scoping review of digital health for older adults with cancer and their families.BMJ open · 2020Article
- Information needs and information seeking behaviour of people with dementia and their non-professional caregivers: a scoping review.BMC geriatrics · 2020Article
- Comprehensive overview of computer-based health information tailoring: a systematic scoping review.BMJ open · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTailoring health information to the needs of individuals has become an important part of modern health communications. Tailoring has been addressed by researchers from different disciplines leading to the emergence of a wide range of approaches, making the newcomers confused. In order to address this, a comprehensive overview of the field with the indications of research gaps, tendencies and trends will be helpful. As a result, a systematic protocol was outlined to conduct a scoping review within the field of computer-based health information tailoring. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol is based on the York's five-stage framework outlined by Arksey and O'Malley. A field-specific structure was defined as a basis for undertaking each stage. The structure comprised three main aspects: ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study investigates the breadth and depth of existing literature on computer-tailoring and as a secondary analysis, does not require ethics approval. We anticipate that the results will identify research gaps and novel ideas for future studies and provide direction to combine methods from different disciplines. The research findings will be submitted for publication to relevant peer-reviewed journals and conferences targeting health promotion and patient education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.