Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29284715›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2017

Pharmacy Diabetes Screening Trial: protocol for a pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial to compare three screening methods for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in Australian community pharmacy.

Ines Krass, Rob Carter, Bernadette Mitchell, Mohammadreza Mohebbi, Sophy T F Shih, Peta Trinder, Vincent L Versace, Frances Wilson, Kevin Mc Namara

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Healthcare Voucher Scheme for Screening of Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Population-Based Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ines KrassFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Rob CarterDeakin Health Economics, Centre for Population Research, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.
Bernadette MitchellFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Mohammadreza MohebbiBiostatistics unit, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Sophy T F ShihDeakin Health Economics, Centre for Population Research, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0049-2888
Peta TrinderSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Centre for Population Health Research, Deakin University, Burwood, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Vincent L VersaceDeakin University School of MedicineWarrnambool Campus, Deakin University, Warnambool, Victoria, Australia.
Frances WilsonFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Kevin Mc NamaraSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Centre for Population Health Research, Deakin University, Burwood, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Deakin University · AUThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWith the rising prevalence of type 2 diabetes in Australia, screening and earlier diagnosis is needed to provide opportunities to intervene with evidence-based lifestyle and treatment options to reduce the individual, social and economic impact of the disease. The objectives of the Pharmacy Diabetes Screening Trial are to compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three screening models for type 2 diabetes in a previously undiagnosed population. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Pharmacy Diabetes Screening Trial is a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial to be conducted in 363 community pharmacies across metropolitan, regional and remote areas of Australia, randomly allocated by geographical clusters to one of three groups, each with 121 pharmacies and 10 304 screening participants. The three groups are: group A: risk assessment using a validated tool (AUSDRISK); group B: AUSDRISK assessment followed by point-of-care glycated haemoglobin testing; and group C: AUSDRISK assessment followed by point-of-care blood glucose testing. The primary clinical outcome measure is the proportion of newly diagnosed cases of type 2 diabetes. Primary outcome comparisons will be conducted using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test to account for clustering. The secondary clinical outcomes measures are the proportion of those who (1) are referred to the general practitioner (GP), (2) take up referral to the GP, (3) are diagnosed with pre-diabetes, that is, impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting glucose and (4) are newly diagnosed with either diabetes or pre-diabetes. The economic outcome measure is the average cost (direct and indirect) per confirmed new case of diagnosed type 2 diabetes based on the incremental net trial-based costs of service delivery and the associated incremental longer term health benefits from a health funder perspective. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committees at University of Sydney and Deakin University. Results will be available on the Sixth Community Pharmacy Agreement website and will be published in peer reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12616001240437; Pre-results.

Indexed as

PharmaciesAdultAgedAustraliaBlood GlucoseCost-Benefit AnalysisDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Early DiagnosisFemaleGlucose Tolerance TestGlycated HemoglobinHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPrediabetic StateBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobingeneral diabeteshealth economicsorganisation of health servicespublic health

Identifiers

PMID29284715
PMCPMC5770957
OpenAlexW2784065337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.