Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29284541›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2017

DotAligner: identification and clustering of RNA structure motifs.

Martin A Smith, Stefan E Seemann, Xiu Cheng Quek, John S Mattick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Martin A SmithRNA Biology and Plasticity Group, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria Street, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia. m.smith@garvan.org.au.
Stefan E SeemannCenter for non-coding RNA in Technology and Health (RTH), University of Copenhagen, Groennegaardsvej 3, Frederiksberg, 1870, Denmark.
Xiu Cheng QuekRNA Biology and Plasticity Group, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria Street, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia.
John S MattickRNA Biology and Plasticity Group, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria Street, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia.

Funding

Cancer Council NSW RG 14-18Carlsbergfondet (DK) 2011_01_0884Innovation Fund Denmark 0603-00320B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diversity of processed transcripts in eukaryotic genomes poses a challenge for the classification of their biological functions. Sparse sequence conservation in non-coding sequences and the unreliable nature of RNA structure predictions further exacerbate this conundrum. Here, we describe a computational method, DotAligner, for the unsupervised discovery and classification of homologous RNA structure motifs from a set of sequences of interest. Our approach outperforms comparable algorithms at clustering known RNA structure families, both in speed and accuracy. It identifies clusters of known and novel structure motifs from ENCODE immunoprecipitation data for 44 RNA-binding proteins.

Indexed as

Cluster AnalysisNucleic Acid ConformationNucleotide MotifsAlgorithmsBase SequenceComputational BiologyGenomicsReproducibility of ResultsRNARNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, UntranslatedRNARNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, UntranslatedFunctional genome annotationFunctions of RNA structuresMachine learningRegulation by non-coding RNAsRNA–protein interactionsRNA structure clustering

Identifiers

PMID29284541
PMCPMC5747123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.