Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29284537›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2017

The CogBIAS longitudinal study protocol: cognitive and genetic factors influencing psychological functioning in adolescence.

Charlotte Booth, Annabel Songco, Sam Parsons, Lauren Heathcote, John Vincent, Robert Keers, Elaine Fox

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Charlotte BoothDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, New Richards Building, Oxford, Headington, OX3 7LG, UK. charlotte.booth@psy.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7576-4070
Annabel SongcoDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, New Richards Building, Oxford, Headington, OX3 7LG, UK.
Sam ParsonsDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, New Richards Building, Oxford, Headington, OX3 7LG, UK.
Lauren HeathcoteDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
John VincentDepartment of Biological and Experimental Psychology, Queen Mary University London, London, UK.
Robert KeersDepartment of Biological and Experimental Psychology, Queen Mary University London, London, UK.
Elaine FoxDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, New Richards Building, Oxford, Headington, OX3 7LG, UK.

Funding

European Research Council 324176Medical Research Council MR/K021281/1Medical Research Council MR/K021281/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOptimal psychological development is dependent upon a complex interplay between individual and situational factors. Investigating the development of these factors in adolescence will help to improve understanding of emotional vulnerability and resilience. The CogBIAS longitudinal study (CogBIAS-L-S) aims to combine cognitive and genetic approaches to investigate risk and protective factors associated with the development of mood and impulsivity-related outcomes in an adolescent sample.

methodsCogBIAS-L-S is a three-wave longitudinal study of typically developing adolescents conducted over 4 years, with data collection at age 12, 14 and 16. At each wave participants will undergo multiple assessments including a range of selective cognitive processing tasks (e.g. attention bias, interpretation bias, memory bias) and psychological self-report measures (e.g. anxiety, depression, resilience). Saliva samples will also be collected at the baseline assessment for genetic analyses. Multilevel statistical analyses will be performed to investigate the developmental trajectory of cognitive biases on psychological functioning, as well as the influence of genetic moderation on these relationships. DISCUSSION: CogBIAS-L-S represents the first longitudinal study to assess multiple cognitive biases across adolescent development and the largest study of its kind to collect genetic data. It therefore provides a unique opportunity to understand how genes and the environment influence the development and maintenance of cognitive biases and provide insight into risk and protective factors that may be key targets for intervention.

Indexed as

CognitionGenetic VariationPsychology, AdolescentAdolescentAnxietyChildDepressionFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMemoryAdolescentsAnxietyCognitive biasDepressionGenetic variationImpulsivityLongitudinalPolygenic sensitivity scoresPsychopathology

Identifiers

PMID29284537
PMCPMC5747087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.