Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29284502›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroinflammation2017

Reciprocal interactions between prostaglandin E2- and estradiol-dependent signaling pathways in the injured zebra finch brain.

Alyssa L Pedersen, Colin J Saldanha

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroinflammation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Brain-derived estrogen and neural function.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2022
    Review
  5. Glial estradiol synthesis after brain injury.Current opinion in endocrine and metabolic research · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alyssa L PedersenDepartment of Biology, Program in Behavior, Cognition and Neuroscience, and the Center for Behavioral Neuroscience, American University, 4400 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Washington, DC, 20016, USA.
Colin J SaldanhaDepartment of Biology, Program in Behavior, Cognition and Neuroscience, and the Center for Behavioral Neuroscience, American University, 4400 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Washington, DC, 20016, USA. saldanha@american.edu.
American University · US

Funding

National Institutes of Health (US) 042767National Institutes of Health (US) 080585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAstrocytic aromatization and consequent increases in estradiol are neuroprotective in the injured brain. In zebra finches, cyclooxygenase-activity is necessary for injury-induced aromatase expression, and increased central estradiol lowers neuroinflammation. The mechanisms underlying these influences are unknown. Here, we document injury-induced, cyclooxygenase-dependent increases in glial aromatase expression and replicate previous work in our lab showing increases in central prostaglandin E2 and estradiol following brain damage. Further, we describe injury-dependent changes in E-prostanoid and estrogen receptor expression and reveal the necessity of E-prostanoid and estrogen receptors in the injury-dependent, reciprocal interactions of neuroinflammatory and neurosteroidogenic pathways.

methodsAdult male and female birds were shams or received bilateral injections of the appropriate drug or vehicle into contralateral telencephalic lobes.

resultsInjuries sustained in the presence of indomethacin (a cyclooxygenase inhibitor) had fewer aromatase-expressing reactive astrocytes relative to injuries injected with vehicle suggesting that cyclooxygenase activity is necessary for the induction of glial aromatase around the site of damage. Injured hemispheres had higher prostaglandin E2 and estradiol content relative to shams. Importantly, injured hemispheres injected with E-prostanoid- or estrogen receptor-antagonists showed elevated prostaglandin E2 and estradiol, respectively, but lower prostaglandin E2 or estradiol-dependent downstream activity (protein kinase A or phosphoinositide-3-kinase mRNA) suggesting that receptor antagonism did not affect injury-induced prostaglandin E2 or estradiol, but inhibited the effects of these ligands. Antagonism of E-prostanoid receptors 3 or 4 prevented injury-induced increases in neural estradiol in males and females, respectively, albeit this apparent sex-difference needs to be tested more stringently. Further, estrogen receptor-α, but not estrogen receptor-β antagonism, exaggerated neural prostaglandin E2 levels relative to the contralateral lobe in both sexes.

conclusionThese data suggest injury-induced, sex-specific prostaglandin E2-dependent estradiol synthesis, and estrogen receptor-α dependent decreases in neuroinflammation in the vertebrate brain.

Indexed as

AnimalsAromataseBrainBrain InjuriesDinoprostoneEstradiolEstrogen AntagonistsFemaleFinchesMaleNeurogliaReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Prostaglandin ESignal TransductionAromataseDinoprostoneEstradiolEstrogen AntagonistsReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Prostaglandin EAstrocytic aromataseBrain injuryEstradiolPGE2

Identifiers

PMID29284502
PMCPMC5747085
OpenAlexW2777832450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.