Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29284475›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2017

Existential decision-making in a fatal progressive disease: how much do legal and medical frameworks matter?

Christian Weber, Barbara Fijalkowska, Katarzyna Ciecwierska, Anna Lindblad, Gisela Badura-Lotter, Peter M Andersen, Magdalena Kuźma-Kozakiewicz, Albert C Ludolph, Dorothée Lulé, Tomasz Pasierski and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Christian WeberInstitute of the History, Philosophy and Ethics of Medicine, University of Ulm, Parkstraße 11, 89073, Ulm, Germany. christiw@gmx.net.
Barbara FijalkowskaInstitute Józefa Piłsudskiego Warszawie, University of Warsaw, Marymoncka 34, 00-968, Warsaw, Poland.
Katarzyna CiecwierskaDepartment of Neurology, Warszawski Uniwersytet Medyczny, Medical University of Warsaw, ul. Żwirki i Wigury 61, 02-091, Warsaw, Poland.
Anna LindbladDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Tomtebodavägen 18, 171 77, Solna, Sweden.
Gisela Badura-LotterInstitute of the History, Philosophy and Ethics of Medicine, University of Ulm, Parkstraße 11, 89073, Ulm, Germany.
Peter M AndersenDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience, Umeå University, -90187, Umeå, SE, Sweden.
Magdalena Kuźma-KozakiewiczDepartment of Neurology, Warszawski Uniwersytet Medyczny, Medical University of Warsaw, ul. Żwirki i Wigury 61, 02-091, Warsaw, Poland.
Albert C LudolphDepartment of Neurology, University of Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Dorothée LuléDepartment of Medical Ethics und Palliative Medicine, Warszawski Uniwersytet Medyczny, Medical University of Warsaw, ul. Żwirki i Wigury 61, 02-091, Warsaw, Poland.
Tomasz PasierskiDepartment of Medical Ethics und Palliative Medicine, Warszawski Uniwersytet Medyczny, Medical University of Warsaw, ul. Żwirki i Wigury 61, 02-091, Warsaw, Poland.
Niels LynöeDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Tomtebodavägen 18, 171 77, Solna, Sweden.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung MND-Net (#01GM1103A)EU Joint Programme - Neurological Disease Research JPND 01ED1405)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare legislation in European countries is similar in many respects. Most importantly, the framework of informed consent determines that physicians have the duty to provide detailed information about available therapeutic options and that patients have the right to refuse measures that contradict their personal values. However, when it comes to end-of-life decision-making a number of differences exist in the more specific regulations of individual countries. These differences and how they might nevertheless impact patient's choices will be addressed in the current debate. MAIN TEXT: In this article we show how the legal and medical frameworks of Germany, Poland and Sweden differ with regard to end-of-life decisions for patients with a fatal progressive disease. Taking Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) as an example, we systematically compare clinical guidelines and healthcare law, pointing out the country-specific differences most relevant for existential decision-making. A fictional case report discusses the implications of these differences for a patient with ALS living in either of the three countries. Patients with ALS in Germany, Poland and Sweden are confronted with a similar spectrum of treatment options. However, the analysis of the normative frameworks shows that the conditions for making existential decisions differ considerably in Germany, Poland and Sweden. Specifically, these differences concern (1) the legal status of advance directives, (2) the conditions under which life-sustaining therapies are started or withheld, and (3) the legal regulations on assisted dying.

conclusionAccording to the presented data, regulations of terminating life-sustaining treatments and the framework of "informed consent" are quite differently understood and implemented in the legal setting of the three countries. It is possible, and even likely, that these differences in the legal and medical frameworks have a considerable influence on existential decisions of patients with ALS.

Indexed as

Decision MakingAdvance DirectivesAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisExistentialismGermanyHumansPolandSwedenTerminal CareWithholding TreatmentAdvance directiveAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)GermanyPalliative carePolandShared decision-makingSwedenTherapeutic treatment

Identifiers

PMID29284475
PMCPMC5745921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.