Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29284421›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2017

Improved performance of Xpert MTB/RIF assay on sputum sediment samples obtained from presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis cases at Kibong'oto infectious diseases hospital in Tanzania.

Peter M Mbelele, Said Aboud, Stellah G Mpagama, Mecky I Matee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Molecular Characterization of theAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The burden and determinants of post-TB lung disease.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peter M MbeleleKibong'oto Infectious Diseases Hospital, P.O BOX 12, Sanya Juu, Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. mbelelepeter@yahoo.com.
Said AboudDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, P.O BOX 65001, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Stellah G MpagamaKibong'oto Infectious Diseases Hospital, P.O BOX 12, Sanya Juu, Kilimanjaro, Tanzania.
Mecky I MateeDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, P.O BOX 65001, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre · TZMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences · TZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe introduction of Xpert MTB/RIF assay (Xpert) has significantly improved diagnosis of Tuberculosis (TB) in resource limited human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) endemic settings. We aimed to modify the Xpert protocol to improve the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB).

methodsThis cross sectional study was conducted among presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) patients at Kibong'oto Infectious Diseases Hospital between August and November 2015. Each patient consented to provide 2 samples of raw sputa. One-sputum sample was sedimented using the Petroff's method and divided into two portions. One portion of sediment was inoculated on Lowenstein-Jensen culture media and observed for any growth for up to 8 weeks. Both, raw sputum and the portions of sediments were tested separately using Xpert with a sample reagent ratio of 1:2. Mean age of patients, prevalence of MTB, Xpert sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value were calculated. An incremental sensitivity was determined. Pearson chi-square and either an independent T or Mann-Whitney U-test were used to compared categorical and continuous variables respectively. A p- value of ≤0.05 was considered significant.

resultsOf the 270 presumptive PTB cases, 262 were eligible for analysis. Eight (3%) were excluded due to contaminated culture. Patients' mean age was 42.9 (±SD 15.1) years of which 173 (66%) were female. The overall prevalence of PTB was 112 (43%), of which the Xpert detected 105 (40%) in sediments and 98 (37%) in raw sputa as compared to culture which detected 85 (32%) cases of PTB. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of Xpert on sputum sediments were 92%, 85%, 74% and 96% respectively. Overall, the incremental sensitivity of Xpert on sediment over raw sputum was 6%. In HIV infected Presumptive PTB, the incremental sensitivity was 12%.

conclusionLowering the sample reagent to sediment dilution ratio increases sensitivity of Xpert on MTB detection among presumptive PTB cases, especially in HIV infected individuals.

Indexed as

AdultAIDS-Related Opportunistic InfectionsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMycobacterium tuberculosisPrevalenceSensitivity and SpecificitySputumTanzaniaTuberculosis, PulmonaryKibong’otoPresumptive-tuberculosisSputum-sedimentsTanzaniaTuberculosisXpert® MTB/RIF

Identifiers

PMID29284421
PMCPMC5747009
OpenAlexW2778806579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.