ArticlePloS one2017
Effects of cross-bridge compliance on the force-velocity relationship and muscle power output.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Relationship between hypertrophy, strength gains and tensiomyography adaptations: a moderator role of contraction duration.European journal of applied physiology · 2022Trial
- Cross-bridge model for predicting muscle short-range stiffness during movement.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- The mediating effect of force and velocity changes on power output enhancement in bench press throw after submaximal isometric conditioning activity in trained males.Biology of sport · 2025Article
- Investigating in vivo force and work production of rat medial gastrocnemius at varying locomotor speeds using a muscle avatar.The Journal of experimental biology · 2024Article
- Cardiac length-dependent activation driven by force-dependent thick-filament dynamics.Biophysical journal · 2024Article
- Design Principles and Benefits of Spatially Explicit Models of Myofilament Function.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Myofilament-associated proteins with intrinsic disorder (MAPIDs) and their resolution by computational modeling.Quarterly reviews of biophysics · 2023Review
- Effects of total knee arthroplasty on skeletal muscle structure and function at the cellular, organellar, and molecular levels.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2022Article
- Iron Supplementation Improves Skeletal Muscle Contractile Properties in Mice with CKD.Kidney360 · 2022Article
- Nitric oxide and skeletal muscle contractile function.Nitric oxide : biology and chemistry · 2022Review
- Applications of Eccentric Exercise to Improve Muscle and Mobility Function in Older Adults.Annals of geriatric medicine and research · 2022Article
- Heart-on-Chip for Combined Cellular Dynamics Measurements and Computational Modeling Towards Clinical Applications.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2022Review
- Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction Squat as Conditioning Activity Within a Contrast Training Sequence in High-Level Preadolescent Trampoline Gymnasts.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Digital light processing of liquid crystal elastomers for self-sensing artificial muscles.Science advances · 2021Article
- Myosin cross-bridge kinetics slow at longer muscle lengths during isometric contractions in intact soleus from mice.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021Article
- Dietary nitrate supplementation increases diaphragm peak power in old mice.The Journal of physiology · 2020Article
- Nebulin and titin modulate cross-bridge cycling and length-dependent calcium sensitivity.The Journal of general physiology · 2019Article
- A short history of the development of mathematical models of cardiac mechanics.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2019Review
- Sarcomere length-dependent effects on CaThe Journal of general physiology · 2019Article
- Nebulin increases thin filament stiffness and force per cross-bridge in slow-twitch soleus muscle fibers.The Journal of general physiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Muscles produce force and power by utilizing chemical energy through ATP hydrolysis. During concentric contractions (shortening), muscles generate less force compared to isometric contractions, but consume greater amounts of energy as shortening velocity increases. Conversely, more force is generated and less energy is consumed during eccentric muscle contractions (lengthening). This relationship between force, energy use, and the velocity of contraction has important implications for understanding muscle efficiency, but the molecular mechanisms underlying this behavior remain poorly understood. Here we used spatially-explicit, multi-filament models of Ca2+-regulated force production within a half-sarcomere to simulate how force production, energy utilization, and the number of bound cross-bridges are affected by dynamic changes in sarcomere length. These computational simulations show that cross-bridge binding increased during slow-velocity concentric and eccentric contractions, compared to isometric contractions. Over the full ranges of velocities that we simulated, cross-bridge cycling and energy utilization (i.e. ATPase rates) increased during shortening, and decreased during lengthening. These findings are consistent with the Fenn effect, but arise from a complicated relationship between velocity-dependent cross-bridge recruitment and cross-bridge cycling kinetics. We also investigated how force production, power output, and energy utilization varied with cross-bridge and myofilament compliance, which is impossible to address under typical experimental conditions. These important simulations show that increasing cross-bridge compliance resulted in greater cross-bridge binding and ATPase activity, but less force was generated per cross-bridge and throughout the sarcomere. These data indicate that the efficiency of force production decreases in a velocity-dependent manner, and that this behavior is sensitive to cross-bridge compliance. In contrast, significant effects of myofilament compliance on force production were only observed during isometric contractions, suggesting that changes in myofilament compliance may not influence power output during non-isometric contractions as greatly as changes in cross-bridge compliance. These findings advance our understanding of how cross-bridge and myofilament properties underlie velocity-dependent changes in contractile efficiency during muscle movement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.