Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29283916›Full record

Trial reportAnesthesia and analgesia2018

Heating and Cooling Rates With an Esophageal Heat Exchange System.

Prathima Kalasbail, Natalya Makarova, Frank Garrett, Daniel I Sessler

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Anesthesia and analgesia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03534141 naterminatednot on this map

Mild Hypothermia and Acute Kidney Injury in Liver Transplantation (MHALT) Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2018 to 2023Enrolled175ConditionsCirrhosis, End Stage Liver Disease, Acute Kidney Injury, Liver TransplantArmsEsophageal cooling/warming device, Mild hypothermia, Normothermia
NCT03832959 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Esophageal Damage During Conventional Pulmonary Vein Ablation Procedures and Potential Strategies to Protect the Esophagus. Pilot Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant PauRan2019 to 2020Enrolled60ConditionsAtrial Fibrillation, Catheter Ablation, Esophageal Fistula, Esophageal DiseasesArmsEnsoETM
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Proactive esophageal cooling protects against thermal insults during high-power short-duration radiofrequency cardiac ablation.International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Prathima KalasbailFrom the Departments of Outcomes Research.
Natalya MakarovaFrom the Departments of Outcomes Research.
Frank GarrettGarrett Technologies, Inc, Northbrook, Illinois.
Daniel I SesslerFrom the Departments of Outcomes Research.
Cleveland Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Esophageal Cooling Device circulates warm or cool water through an esophageal heat exchanger, but warming and cooling efficacy in patients remains unknown. We therefore determined heat exchange rates during warming and cooling.

methodsNineteen patients completed the trial. All had general endotracheal anesthesia for nonthoracic surgery. Intraoperative heat transfer was measured during cooling (exchanger fluid at 7°C) and warming (fluid at 42°C). Each was evaluated for 30 minutes, with the initial condition determined randomly, starting at least 40 minutes after induction of anesthesia. Heat transfer rate was estimated from fluid flow through the esophageal heat exchanger and inflow and outflow temperatures. Core temperature was estimated from a zero-heat-flux thermometer positioned on the forehead.

resultsMean heat transfer rate during warming was 18 (95% confidence interval, 16-20) W, which increased core temperature at a rate of 0.5°C/h ± 0.6°C/h (mean ± standard deviation). During cooling, mean heat transfer rate was -53 (-59 to -48) W, which decreased core temperature at a rate of 0.9°C/h ± 0.9°C/h.

conclusionsEsophageal warming transferred 18 W which is considerably less than the 80 W reported with lower or upper body forced-air covers. However, esophageal warming can be used to supplement surface warming or provide warming in cases not amenable to surface warming. Esophageal cooling transferred more than twice as much heat as warming, consequent to the much larger difference between core and circulating fluid temperature with cooling (29°C) than warming (6°C). Esophageal cooling extracts less heat than endovascular catheters but can be used to supplement catheter-based cooling or possibly replace them in appropriate patients.

Indexed as

Body Temperature RegulationAdultAgedAnesthesia, GeneralEnergy TransferEquipment DesignEsophagusFemaleHumansHyperthermia, InducedHypothermia, InducedIntraoperative CareMaleMiddle AgedOhioThermometers

Identifiers

PMID29283916
PMCPMC5882296
OpenAlexW2778221885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.