ArticleAnnals of the American Thoracic Society2018
Physician-Level Variation in Outcomes of Mechanically Ventilated Patients.
Article in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic Review: Association Between Physicians' Clinical Experience and Quality of Care and Patient Outcomes.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Teaching surgery novices and trainees advanced laparoscopic suturing: a trial and tribulations.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Trial
- Algorithmic Identification of the Daily Primary Frontline Clinician during Inpatient Medicine Encounters Using EHR Audit Log Data.Applied clinical informatics · 2026Article
- Clinician Volume and Outcomes Among Patients Admitted to Nursing Homes for Postacute Care.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Using Electronic Health Records to Identify the Daily Primary Provider During Hospitalization.Critical care explorations · 2024Article
- Making machine learning matter to clinicians: model actionability in medical decision-making.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Review
- Similarities in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation management across intensive care unit types in the United States: An analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry.Artificial organs · 2022Article
- The Doctors' Effect on Patients' Physical Health Outcomes Beyond the Intervention: A Methodological Review.Clinical epidemiology · 2022Article
- Is There a Doctors' Effect on Patients' Physical Health, Beyond the Intervention and All Known Factors? A Systematic Review.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2022Review
- Physicians' clinical experience and its association with healthcare quality: a systematised review.BMJ open quality · 2021Article
- Risk orientation predicts hypoxic time during difficult airway simulation: a mixed-methods pilot study.BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning · 2020Article
- Aligning use of intensive care with patient values in the USA: past, present, and future.The Lancet. Respiratory medicine · 2019Review
- Update in Critical Care and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome 2018.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2019Article
- ICU staffing models and patient outcomes.Journal of intensive care · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rationalePhysicians are increasingly being held accountable for patient outcomes, yet their specific contribution to the outcomes remains uncertain.
objectivesTo determine variation in outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients among intensivists, as well as associations between intensivist experience and patient outcomes.
methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of mechanically ventilated Medicare fee-for-service patients in acute care hospitals in Pennsylvania using administrative, clinical, and physician data from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the American Medical Association from 2008 and 2009. We identified intensivists by training background, board certification, and claims for services provided to patients admitted to an intensive care unit. We assigned patients to intensivists for outcome attribution based on submitted claims for critical care and in-patient services. We estimated the physician-specific adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for 30-day mortality using a hierarchical model with a random effect for physician, adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics. We tested for independent association of physician experience with patient outcomes using mixed-effects regression for the primary outcome of 30-day mortality. We defined physician experience in two ways: years since training completion ("duration") and annual number of mechanically ventilated patients ("volume").
resultsWe assigned 345 physicians to 11,268 patients. The 30-day mortality was 43% and median hospital length of stay was 11 days (interquartile range = 6-18). The physician adjusted OR varied from 0.72 to 1.64 (median = 0.99; interquartile range = 0.92-1.09). A total of 48% of physicians was outliers, with an adjusted OR significantly different from 1. However, among intensivists, physician experience was not associated with 30-day mortality (duration OR = 1.00 per additional year; 95% confidence interval = 1.00-1.01; volume OR = 1.00 per additional patient; 95% confidence interval = 1.00-1.00).
conclusionsIntensivists independently contribute to outcomes of Medicare patients who undergo mechanical ventilation, as evidenced by the variation in risk-adjusted mortality across intensivists. However, physician experience does not underlie this relationship between intensivists, suggesting the need to identify modifiable physician factors to improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.