Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29283496›Full record

ArticleCytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology2018

Quantitative assessment of cancer cell morphology and motility using telecentric digital holographic microscopy and machine learning.

Van K Lam, Thanh C Nguyen, Byung M Chung, George Nehmetallah, Christopher B Raub

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Digital Holographic Microscopy for Phenotypic Profiling of Adherent Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Digital Holographic Microscopy to Assess Cell Behavior.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Morphology, Motility, and Cytoskeletal Architecture of Breast Cancer Cells Depend on Keratin 19 and Substrate.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Machine Learning with Optical Phase Signatures for Phenotypic Profiling of Cell Lines.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Van K LamDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC 20064.
Thanh C NguyenDepartment of Electrical Engineering, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC 20064.
Byung M ChungDepartment of Biology, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC 20064.
George NehmetallahDepartment of Electrical Engineering, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC 20064.
Christopher B RaubDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC 20064.
University of America · US

Funding

Mechanism and Impact of an Interaction Between Keratin 19 and a Regulator of Gene ExpressionR15CA213071 · NCI · CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA · PI CHUNG, BYUNG MIN · 2018 to 2018
$473k
NCI NIH HHS R15 CA213071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The noninvasive, fast acquisition of quantitative phase maps using digital holographic microscopy (DHM) allows tracking of rapid cellular motility on transparent substrates. On two-dimensional surfaces in vitro, MDA-MB-231 cancer cells assume several morphologies related to the mode of migration and substrate stiffness, relevant to mechanisms of cancer invasiveness in vivo. The quantitative phase information from DHM may accurately classify adhesive cancer cell subpopulations with clinical relevance. To test this, cells from the invasive breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cell line were cultured on glass, tissue-culture treated polystyrene, and collagen hydrogels, and imaged with DHM followed by epifluorescence microscopy after staining F-actin and nuclei. Trends in cell phase parameters were tracked on the different substrates, during cell division, and during matrix adhesion, relating them to F-actin features. Support vector machine learning algorithms were trained and tested using parameters from holographic phase reconstructions and cell geometric features from conventional phase images, and used to distinguish between elongated and rounded cell morphologies. DHM was able to distinguish between elongated and rounded morphologies of MDA-MB-231 cells with 94% accuracy, compared to 83% accuracy using cell geometric features from conventional brightfield microscopy. This finding indicates the potential of DHM to detect and monitor cancer cell morphologies relevant to cell cycle phase status, substrate adhesion, and motility. © 2017 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.

Indexed as

Machine LearningActinsBreast NeoplasmsCell AdhesionCell CycleCell Line, TumorCell MovementCell NucleusHolographyHumansMicroscopy, FluorescenceNeoplasm InvasivenessActinsactinsbreast cancer cell linecell motilityholographymicroscopysupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID29283496
PMCPMC8245299
OpenAlexW2781229448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.