Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29283318›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational and environmental hygiene2018

Surgical smoke control with local exhaust ventilation: Experimental study.

Taekhee Lee, Jhy-Charm Soo, Ryan F LeBouf, Dru Burns, Diane Schwegler-Berry, Michael Kashon, Jay Bowers, Martin Harper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Surgical smoke and its components, effects, and mitigation: a contemporary review.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Do we need to reduce surgical smoke?Annals of translational medicine · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Surgical Team Exposure to Cautery Smoke and Its Mitigation during Tonsillectomy.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2020
    Article
  14. Surgical smoke and the anesthesia provider.Journal of anesthesia · 2020
    Review
  15. Effect of Electrocautery Settings on Particulate Concentrations in Surgical Plume during Tonsillectomy.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2020
    Article
  16. Surgical Smoke-Hazard Perceptions and Protective Measures in German Operating Rooms.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. In vitro toxicological evaluation of surgical smoke from human tissue.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Taekhee Leea Exposure Assessment Branch, Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Morgantown , West Virginia.
Jhy-Charm Sooa Exposure Assessment Branch, Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Morgantown , West Virginia.
Ryan F LeBoufb Field Study Branch Respiratory Health Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Morgantown , West Virginia.
Dru Burnsb Field Study Branch Respiratory Health Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Morgantown , West Virginia.
Diane Schwegler-Berryc Pathology and Physiology Research Branch, Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Morgantown , West Virginia.
Michael Kashond Biostatistics and Epidemiology Branch, Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Morgantown , West Virginia.
Jay Bowerse West Virginia University Ruby Memorial Hospital , Morgantown , West Virginia.
Martin Harpera Exposure Assessment Branch, Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Morgantown , West Virginia.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USWest Virginia University Hospitals · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This experimental study aimed to evaluate airborne particulates and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from surgical smoke when a local exhaust ventilation (LEV) system is in place. Surgical smoke was generated from human tissue in an unoccupied operating room using an electrocautery surgical device for 15 min with 3 different test settings: (1) without LEV control; (2) control with a wall irrigation suction unit with an in-line ultra-low penetration air filter; and (3) control with a smoke evacuation system. Flow rate of LEVs was approximately 35 L/min and suction was maintained within 5 cm of electrocautery interaction site. A total of 6 experiments were conducted. Particle number and mass concentrations were measured using direct reading instruments including a condensation particle counter (CPC), a light-scattering laser photometer (DustTrak DRX), a scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS), an aerodynamic particle sizer (APS), and a viable particle counter. Selected VOCs were collected using evacuated canisters using grab, personal and area sampling techniques. The largest average particle and VOCs concentrations were found in the absence of LEV control followed by LEV controls. Average ratios of LEV controls to without LEV control ranged 0.24-0.33 (CPC), 0.28-0.39 (SMPS), 0.14-0.31 (DustTrak DRX), and 0.26-0.55 (APS). Ethanol and isopropyl alcohol were dominant in the canister samples. Acetaldehyde, acetone, acetonitrile, benzene, hexane, styrene, and toluene were detected but at lower concentrations (<500 μg/m

Indexed as

ElectrocoagulationAir Pollutants, OccupationalHumansOccupational ExposureParticulate MatterSmokeVentilationVolatile Organic CompoundsAir Pollutants, OccupationalParticulate MatterSmokeVolatile Organic CompoundsElectrocauteryhealthcare workerslocal exhaust ventilationsurgical smoke

Identifiers

PMID29283318
PMCPMC6460469
OpenAlexW2780406094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.