Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29283122›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2018

Results of simple limbal epithelial transplantation in unilateral ocular surface burn.

Nidhi Gupta, Jagdish Joshi, Javed Hussain Farooqui, Umang Mathur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Corneal injury: Clinical and molecular aspects.Experimental eye research · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nidhi GuptaDepartment of Cornea, External Diseases and Refractive Surgery, Dr. Shroff's Charity Eye Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Jagdish JoshiDepartment of Cornea, External Diseases and Refractive Surgery, Dr. Shroff's Charity Eye Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Javed Hussain FarooquiDepartment of Cornea, External Diseases and Refractive Surgery, Dr. Shroff's Charity Eye Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Umang MathurDepartment of Cornea, External Diseases and Refractive Surgery, Dr. Shroff's Charity Eye Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to report the long-term outcomes of autologous Simple Limbal Epithelial Transplantation (SLET) performed for unilateral limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) following chemical burn at a tertiary eye center in North India.

methodsThis was a single-center prospective interventional case series of patients who developed unilateral LSCD after suffering from ocular surface burns and who underwent SLET between October 2012 and May 2016 with a follow-up period of at least 6 months. The primary outcome measure was restoration of a completely epithelized, stable, and avascular corneal surface. The secondary outcome measure was percentage of eyes, which reported visual gain.

resultsThe study included 30 eyes of 30 patients, 18 adults and 12 children, at a median follow-up of 1.1 years (range: 6 months to 3.5 years), 21 of 30 eyes (70%; 95% confidence interval, 53.6%-86.2%) maintained successful outcome. Visual acuity gain was seen in 71.4% of successful cases. The clinical factors associated with failure were identified as acid injury, severe symblepharon at the time of presentation, and SLET combined with penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

conclusionAutologous SLET is an effective limbal cell transplantation technique for the treatment of unilateral LSCD. It is especially beneficial for centers where cell cultivation laboratory is unavailable. Presence of severe symblepharon, which requires PK peroperatively , has poor outcome.

Indexed as

AdolescentBurns, ChemicalChildChild, PreschoolCorneal TransplantationEpithelium, CornealEye BurnsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLimbus CorneaeMaleProspective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29283122
PMCPMC5778581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.