ReviewIndian journal of ophthalmology2018
Refractive lenticule extraction small incision lenticule extraction: A new refractive surgery paradigm.
Review in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06080100 (RELIEF OF PSYCHOEMOTIONAL STRESS BEFORE REFRACTIVE LASER VISION CORRECTION SURGERY USING XENON SEDATION), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Relief of psychoemotional stress before refractive laser vision correction surgery using xenon sedation
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- One year outcomes after small incision lenticule extraction ReLEX in the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism.BMC ophthalmology · 2021Trial
- GPT-5-assisted versus expert surgeon refractive planning in smooth incision lenticule keratomileusis (SILK): comparative analysis and visual outcomes.International ophthalmology · 2026Observational
- Comparative analysis of 70 SMILE and 70 toric ICL eyes for myopic oblique astigmatism: a matched cohort study from an initial pool of 11,929 eyes.International ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Comparative Vector Analysis of Astigmatic Changes After Small-incision Lenticule Extraction versus Femtosecond Laser In -situ Keratomileusis.Journal of ophthalmic & vision research · 2026Article
- Factors Affecting Visual Outcome after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) Pro.Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO · 2025Article
- The Efficiency, Predictability and Safety Between Custom-Q Femotsecond Laser In Situ Keratomileusis and Second (Visumax 800) Generation Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction Surgery.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparison Between Topographic-Based and Manifest-Based Astigmatism Corrections in the Second (Visumax 800)-Generation Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction Surgery: A Real-World Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- VISULYZE-Generated Nomogram-Assisted KLEx for Myopia and Astigmatism Correction: 3-Month Follow-Up Results.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Visual outcomes for the initial 500 eyes treated with keratorefractive lenticule extraction (KLEx) for myopia and myopic astigmatism at a single-site.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2025Article
- Comparing The Existing Myopic Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction (KLEx) Platforms: A Narrative Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Review
- Evaluating the Impact of Angle Kappa on Effective Optical Zone in Kerato-Lenticule Extraction (KLEx) Surgery with Intraoperative Angle Kappa Adjustment.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Comparison of Visual and Refractive Outcomes Between Refractive Lens Exchange and Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction Surgery in Moderate to High Myopia.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Comparative Analysis of Corneal Wound Healing: Differential Molecular Responses in Tears Following PRK, FS-LASIK, and SMILE Procedures.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- The outcomes of first-generation (visumax 500) and second-generation (Visumax 800) keratorefractive lenticule extraction surgeries for astigmatism.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The Risk Factors for Myopia Undercorrection in Second-Generation (Visumax 800) Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction Surgery: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Early elastic and viscoelastic corneal biomechanical changes after photorefractive keratectomy and small incision lenticule extraction.International ophthalmology · 2024Article
- The Efficiency, Predictability, and Safety of First-Generation (Visumax 500) and Second-Generation (Visumax 800) Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction Surgeries: Real-World Experiences.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Refractive outcomes of small lenticule extraction (SMILE) Pro® with a 2 MHz femtosecond laser.International ophthalmology · 2024Article
- "Ridge Sign" to Identify Anterior-Posterior Plane in Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Article
- Comparative study of small incision refractive lenticule extraction with 5 mm versus 6.5 mm optic zone for myopia.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), a variant of refractive lenticule extraction technology is becoming increasingly popular, as a flapless and minimally invasive form of laser vision correction (LVC) for the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism. This review aims at summarizing the principles, surgical technique, and clinical outcomes in terms of visual and refractive results, safety, efficacy, postoperative dry eye, aberrations, and biomechanics of SMILE and its comparison with other conventional techniques of LVC, such as laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Recent advancements in the laser frequency and energy delivery patterns, instrumentation, and surgical techniques have shown significant improvement in the visual recovery and outcomes after SMILE, compared to the initial results published by Sekundo and Shah et al. Most of the recently published literature on long-term outcomes of SMILE shows excellent stability of the procedure, especially for higher myopia. In terms of the postoperative dry eye, SMILE shows a clear advantage over LASIK as numerous studies have shown significant differences about the Schirmer's, Tear film break up time, corneal sensitivity, and corneal nerve regeneration to be better following SMILE compared to LASIK. There is some evidence that since the Bowman's membrane (BM) and the anterior lamellae remain intact after SMILE, this may be a potential advantage for corneal biomechanics over LASIK and PRK where the BM is either severed or ablated, respectively, however, the data on biomechanics are inconclusive at present. Overall, this procedure has proved to be promising, delivering equivalent, or better visual and refractive results to LASIK and providing clear advantage in terms of being a flapless, minimally invasive procedure with minimal pain and postoperative discomfort thus offering high patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.