Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29283079›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS2018

Differential Contributions of Selective Attention and Sensory Integration to Driving Performance in Healthy Aging and Alzheimer's Disease.

Umesh M Venkatesan, Elena K Festa, Brian R Ott, William C Heindel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Current Evidence for Assessing Fitness to Drive of People with Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Sleep and Attention in Alzheimer's Disease.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Umesh M Venkatesan1Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior,Alpert Medical School,Brown University,Providence,Rhode Island.
Elena K Festa2Department of Cognitive,Linguistic,and Psychological Sciences,Brown University,Providence,Rhode Island.
Brian R Ott3Department of Neurology,Alpert Medical School,Brown University,Providence,Rhode Island.
William C Heindel2Department of Cognitive,Linguistic,and Psychological Sciences,Brown University,Providence,Rhode Island.

Funding

Naturalistic Assessment of the Driving ability of Cognitively Impaired EldersR01AG016335 · NIA · RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL · PI OTT, BRIAN R · 2001 to 2010
$2.9M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG016335
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPatients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) demonstrate deficits in cross-cortical feature binding distinct from age-related changes in selective attention. This may have consequences for driving performance given its demands on multisensory integration. We examined the relationship of visuospatial search and binding to driving in patients with early AD and elderly controls (EC).

methodsParticipants (42 AD; 37 EC) completed search tasks requiring either luminance-motion (L-M) or color-motion (C-M) binding, analogs of within and across visual processing stream binding, respectively. Standardized road test (RIRT) and naturalistic driving data (CDAS) were collected alongside clinical screening measures.

resultsPatients performed worse than controls on most cognitive and driving indices. Visual search and clinical measures were differentially related to driving behavior across groups. L-M search and Trail Making Test (TMT-B) were associated with RIRT performance in controls, while C-M binding, TMT-B errors, and Clock Drawing correlated with CDAS performance in patients. After controlling for demographic and clinical predictors, L-M reaction time significantly predicted RIRT performance in controls. In patients, C-M binding made significant contributions to CDAS above and beyond demographic and clinical predictors. RIRT and C-M binding measures accounted for 51% of variance in CDAS performance in patients.

conclusionsWhereas selective attention is associated with driving behavior in EC, cross-cortical binding appears most sensitive to driving in AD. This latter relationship may emerge only in naturalistic settings, which better reflect patients' driving behavior. Visual integration may offer distinct insights into driving behavior, and thus has important implications for assessing driving competency in early AD. (JINS, 2018, 24, 486-497).

Indexed as

AttentionPsychomotor PerformanceAgedAlzheimer DiseaseAppetitive BehaviorAutomobile DrivingCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMalePerceptionReaction TimeTrail Making TestCognitionDementiaGeriatricsOlder driversPerceptionVisual search

Identifiers

PMID29283079
PMCPMC5910249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.