ArticleMolecular neurobiology2018
Elevated Surfactant Protein Levels and Increased Flow of Cerebrospinal Fluid in Cranial Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Article in Molecular neurobiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Extracellular protein homeostasis in neurodegenerative diseases.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2023Review
- Regionally Altered Immunosignals of Surfactant Protein-G, Vascular and Non-Vascular Elements of the Neurovascular Unit after Experimental Focal Cerebral Ischemia in Mice, Rats, and Sheep.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Surfactant Protein-G in Wildtype and 3xTg-AD Mice: Localization in the Forebrain, Age-Dependent Hippocampal Dot-like Deposits and Brain Content.Biomolecules · 2022Article
- CSF Surfactant Protein Changes in Preterm Infants After Intraventricular Hemorrhage.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2020Article
- Rheologically Essential Surfactant Proteins of the CSF Interacting with Periventricular White Matter Changes in Hydrocephalus Patients - Implications for CSF Dynamics and the Glymphatic System.Molecular neurobiology · 2019Article
- Localization, Occurrence, and CSF Changes of SP-G, a New Surface Active Protein with Assumable Immunoregulatory Functions in the CNS.Molecular neurobiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Surfactant proteins (SPs) are a multifunctional group of proteins, responsible for the regulation of rheological properties of body fluids, host defense, and cellular waste clearance. Their concentrations are changed in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients suffering from communicating hydrocephalus. Hydrocephalic conditions are accompanied by altered CSF flow dynamics; however, the association of CSF-SP concentrations and CSF flow has not yet been investigated. Hence, the aim of this study was to evaluate the association between SP concentrations in the CSF and marked CSF flow phenomena at different anatomical landmarks of CSF spaces. Sixty-one individuals (15 healthy subjects and 46 hydrocephalus patients) were included in this study. CSF specimens were analyzed for SP-A, SP-B, SP-C, and SP-D concentrations by the use of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). CSF flow was evaluated in axial T2_turbo inversion recovery magnitude (TIRM)-weighted and sagittal T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sections using a 4-grade scale (1-no flow, 2-subtle flow, 3-moderate flow, and 4-strong flow). CSF-SP concentrations (mean ± standard deviation) of the overall collective were as follows: SP-A = 0.73 ± 0.58 ng/ml, SP-B = 0.17 ± 0.93 ng/ml, SP-C = 0.95 ± 0.75 ng/ml, and SP-D = 7.43 ± 5.17 ng/ml. The difference between healthy controls and hydrocephalic patients regarding CSF concentrations of SP-A (0.34 ± 0.22 vs. 0.81 ± 0.59 ng/ml) and SP-C (0.48 ± 0.29 vs. 1.10 ± 0.79 ng/ml) revealed to be statistically significant as calculated by means of ANOVA (p values of 0.022 and 0.007, respectively). CSF flow voids were detectable at all investigated landmarks of the CSF spaces (foramina of Monro, third ventricle, mesencephalic aqueduct, prepontine cistern, fourth ventricle, cisterna magna, and craniocervical junction). CSF flow voids, reported as mean ± standard deviation, revealed to be significantly increased in hydrocephalic patients compared to controls as calculated by means of ANOVA (respective p values are given in brackets following values of descriptive statistics) at the following sites: foramina of Monro (1.60 ± 0.91 vs. 2.37 ± 0.99, p = 0.01), fourth ventricle (1.67 ± 0.98 vs. 2.52 ± 1.05, p = 0.007), and the cisterna magna (1.93 ± 1.10 vs. 2.72 ± 1.13, p = 0.022). Spearman's rank order calculation identified significant correlations for CSF flow voids at the foramina of Monro and the third ventricle with SP-A (r = 0.429, p = 0.001 and r = 0.464, p < 0.001) and CSF flow void at the mesencephalic duct with SP-D (r = - 0.371, p = 0.039). Furthermore, SP-C showed a moderate inverse correlation with age (r = - 0.302, p = 0.022). The present study confirmed statistically significant differences in SP-CSF concentrations between healthy controls and hydrocephalic patients. Additionally, significant correlations between SP concentrations in CSF with increased CSF flow were identified. These findings underline the role of SPs as regulators of CSF rheology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.