Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29282650›Full record

Trial reportJournal of occupational rehabilitation2018

Trajectories of Return to Work Among People on Sick Leave with Mood or Anxiety Disorders: Secondary Analysis from a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Lone Hellström, Trine Madsen, Merete Nordentoft, Per Bech, Lene Falgaard Eplov

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01721824 (IPS-MA - A Randomized Clinical Trial Examining the Effect of a Modified IPS Intervention in Addition to Treatment as Usual Versus Treatment as Usual Alone for Individuals With Mood or Anxiety Disorders), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01721824 nacompletednot on this map

IPS-MA - A Randomized Clinical Trial Examining the Effect of a Modified IPS Intervention in Addition to Treatment as Usual Versus Treatment as Usual Alone for Individuals With Mood or Anxiety Disorders

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmager HospitalRan2011 to 2016Enrolled326ConditionsAffective Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, Anxiety DisorderArmsThe IPS-MA method
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lone HellströmCopenhagen University Hospital, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Kildegårdsvej 28, 2900, Hellerup, Denmark. lone.hellstroem@regionh.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-1137-6455
Trine MadsenCopenhagen University Hospital, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Kildegårdsvej 28, 2900, Hellerup, Denmark.
Merete NordentoftCopenhagen University Hospital, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Kildegårdsvej 28, 2900, Hellerup, Denmark.
Per BechPsychiatric Research Unit, Mental Health Centre North Zealand, University of Copenhagen, Dyrehavevej 48, 3400, Hillerød, Denmark.
Lene Falgaard EplovCopenhagen University Hospital, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Kildegårdsvej 28, 2900, Hellerup, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose The return to work (RTW) of people with mood and anxiety disorders is a heterogeneous process. We aimed to identify prototypical trajectories of RTW over a two-year period in people on sick leave with mood and anxiety disorders, and investigate if socio-demographic or clinical factors predicted trajectory membership. Methods We used data from the randomized IPS-MA trial (n = 283), evaluating a supported employment intervention for participants with recently diagnosed mood or anxiety disorders. Information on "weeks in employment in the past 6 months" was measured after 1/2, 1, 1 ½ and 2 years, using data from a nationwide Danish register (DREAM). Latent growth mixture modelling analysis was carried out to identify trajectories of RTW and logistic regression analyses were used to estimate predictors for trajectory membership. Results Four trajectory classes of RTW were identified; non-RTW [70% (196/283)] (practically no return to work); delayed-RTW [19% (56/283)] (6 months delay before full RTW); rapid-unstable-RTW [7% (19/283)] (members rapidly returned to work, but only worked half the time); and the smallest class, rapid-RTW [4% (12/283)] (members rapidly reached full employment, but later experienced a decrease in weeks of employment). Self-reported disability score according to the SDS, not living with a partner, and readiness to change on the CQ scale were found to be significantly associated with RTW. Conclusion The trajectories identified support that many do not benefit from vocational rehabilitation, or experience difficulties sustaining employment; enhanced support of this patient group is still warranted.Trial registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT01721824).

Indexed as

AdultAnxiety DisordersEmployment, SupportedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalMood DisordersPersons with DisabilitiesReturn to WorkSick LeaveAnxiety disorderMood disorderReturn to workTrajectories

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.