Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29282588›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2018

Impact of specialist rehabilitation services on hospital length of stay and associated costs.

A Duarte, C Bojke, W Cayton, A Salawu, B Case, L Bojke, G Richardson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Contracting with sequential care providers.Health economics review · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A DuarteCentre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK. ana.duarte@york.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0528-4773
C BojkeFaculty of Medicine and Health, Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2601-0314
W CaytonHull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, HU3 2JZ, UK.
A SalawuHull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, HU3 2JZ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2496-0826
B CaseNHS Vale of York Clinical Commissioning Group, York, YO1 6GA, UK.
L BojkeCentre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7921-9109
G RichardsonCentre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2360-4566

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProvision of specialist rehabilitation services in North Yorkshire and Humberside may be suboptimal. Local commissioning bodies need to prioritise investments in health care, but previous studies provide limited evidence to inform the decision to expand existing services on the basis of cost-effectiveness. We examine the impact of specialist rehabilitation services in the subregion on hospital length of stay (LoS) and associated costs compared to routine care.

methodsComparison of hospital LoS and associated costs in centres with greater access (Hull) and limited access (i.e. routine care, York and Northern Lincolnshire), to specialist rehabilitation services for patients with complex disabilities following illness or injury, using Hospital Episodes Statistics data.

resultsAverage LoS and duration costs by Healthcare Resource Group (HRG) were lower for the majority of patients with greater access to specialist rehabilitation compared to routine care. Difference in LoS between groups widened with level of complexity within each HRG. For the more frequent HRG codes, the LoS difference was as high as 34 days longer for York compared to Hull and £7900 more costly.

conclusionRehabilitation patients within York and Northern Lincolnshire areas appear to have longer LoS and higher associated costs compared to those admitted to the Hull Trust. This analysis suggests that specialist rehabilitation may be cost saving compared to routine care and supports the case for expansion of the existing services to improve coverage in the area.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsHospitalizationLength of StayCost-Benefit AnalysisEnglandHealth ResourcesHospital CostsHumansRehabilitationComplex disabilityLength of stayLocal decision makingSpecialist rehabilitationTrauma

Identifiers

PMID29282588
PMCPMC6105206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.