Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29282568›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2018

Development of a sensitive PCR-dot blot assay to supplement serological tests for diagnosing Lyme disease.

J S Shah, I D' Cruz, S Ward, N S Harris, R Ramasamy

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Dermatological and Genital Manifestations of Lyme Disease Including Morgellons Disease.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Laboratory Diagnostic Tools for Syphilis: Current Status and Future Prospects.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Pilot Study of Immunoblots with RecombinantHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J S ShahIGeneX Inc., 795 San Antonio Road, Palo Alto, CA, 94303, USA. jshah@igenex.com.
I D' CruzIGeneX Inc., 795 San Antonio Road, Palo Alto, CA, 94303, USA.
S WardIGeneX Inc., 795 San Antonio Road, Palo Alto, CA, 94303, USA.
N S HarrisIGeneX Inc., 795 San Antonio Road, Palo Alto, CA, 94303, USA.
R RamasamyIGeneX Inc., 795 San Antonio Road, Palo Alto, CA, 94303, USA.
FX Palo Alto Laboratory · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laboratory diagnosis of Lyme disease is difficult and presently dependent on detecting Borrelia burgdorferi-specific antibodies in patient serum with the disadvantage that the immune response to B. burgdorferi can be weak or variable, or alternatively, the slow and inefficient culture confirmation of B. burgdorferi. PCR tests have previously shown poor sensitivity and are not routinely used for diagnosis. We developed a sensitive and specific Lyme Multiplex PCR-dot blot assay (LM-PCR assay) applicable to blood and urine samples to supplement western blot (WB) serological tests for detecting B. burgdorferi infection. The LM-PCR assay utilizes specific DNA hybridization to purify B. burgdorferi DNA followed by PCR amplification of p66 [corrected] and OspA gene fragments and their detection by southern dot blots. Results of the assay on 107 and 402 clinical samples from patients with suspected Lyme disease from Houston, Texas or received at the IGeneX laboratory in Palo Alto, California, respectively, were analyzed together with WB findings. The LM-PCR assay was highly specific for B. burgdorferi. In the Texas samples, 23 (21.5%) patients antibody-negative in WB assays by current US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommended criteria were positive by LM-PCR performed on urine, serum or whole blood samples. With IGeneX samples, of the 402 LM-PCR positive blood samples, only 70 met the CDC criteria for positive WBs, while 236 met IGeneX criteria for positive WB. Use of the LM-PCR assay and optimization of current CDC serological criteria can improve the diagnosis of Lyme disease.

Indexed as

DNA, BacterialAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, BacterialBorrelia burgdorferiChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLimit of DetectionLyme DiseaseMiddle AgedPolymerase Chain ReactionAntibodies, BacterialDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID29282568
PMCPMC5978905
OpenAlexW2779711056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.