Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29282539›Full record

SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2018

The Global Spine Care Initiative: a systematic review of individual and community-based burden of spinal disorders in rural populations in low- and middle-income communities.

Eric L Hurwitz, Kristi Randhawa, Paola Torres, Hainan Yu, Leslie Verville, Jan Hartvigsen, Pierre Côté, Scott Haldeman

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04521244 (Immediate Effects of Thrust Versus Non-thrust Lumbar Manipulation on Mobility and Springing Force Tolerance in Lumbar Hypomobility), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04521244 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Immediate Effects of Thrust Versus Non-thrust Lumbar Manipulation on Mobility and Springing Force Tolerance in Lumbar Hypomobility

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled30ConditionsHypomotility, Lumbar Spine InstabilityArmsThrust joint lumbar manipulation, Lumbar mobilization
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pain severity and opioid use in patients with spine-related diagnoses.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Measuring disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) due to low back pain in Malta.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Eric L HurwitzOffice of Public Health Studies, University of Hawai`i, Mānoa, Honolulu, HI, USA. ehurwitz@hawaii.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3641-0784
Kristi RandhawaFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6563-7203
Paola TorresRehabilitation Centre, San Cristobal Clinic, Santiago Spine Group, Santiago, Chile.
Hainan YuFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7734-0674
Leslie VervilleFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, Canada.
Jan HartvigsenDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark and Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5876-7410
Pierre CôtéFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7227-6485
Scott HaldemanDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8688-9562
Ontario Tech University · CAUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · USUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this review was to synthesize literature on the burden of spinal disorders in rural communities to inform the Global Spine Care Initiative care pathway and model of care for their application in medically underserved areas and low- and middle-income countries.

methodsA systematic review was conducted. Inclusion criteria included all age groups with nonspecific low back pain, neck pain, and associated disorders, nonspecific thoracic spinal pain, musculoskeletal chest pain, radiculopathy, or spinal stenosis. Study designs included observational study design (case-control, cross-sectional, cohort, ecologic, qualitative) or review or meta-analysis. After study selection, studies with low or moderate risk of bias were qualitatively synthesized.

resultsOf 1150 potentially relevant articles, 43 were eligible and included in the review. All 10 low and 18 moderate risk of bias studies were cross-sectional, 14 of which included rural residents only. All studies included estimates of low back pain prevalence, one included neck pain and one reported estimates for spinal disorders other than back or neck pain. The prevalence of low back pain appears greater among females and in those with less education, psychological factors (stress, anxiety, depression), and alcohol consumers. The literature is inconsistent as to whether back pain is more common in rural or urban areas. High risk of bias in many studies, lack of data on disability and other burden measures and few studies on conditions other than back and neck pain preclude a more comprehensive assessment of the individual and community-based burden of spinal disorders in less-developed communities.

conclusionWe identified few high-quality studies that may inform patients, providers, policymakers, and other stakeholders about spinal disorders and their burden on individuals and communities in most rural places of the developing world. These findings should be a call to action to devote resources for high-quality research to fill these knowledge gaps in medically underserved areas and low and middle-income countries. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesHealth BehaviorHumansLow Back PainNeck PainOccupational DiseasesRural PopulationSpinal DiseasesStress, PsychologicalBack painGlobal burden of diseaseNeck painSpine

Identifiers

PMID29282539
OpenAlexW2779832070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.