Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29282496›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of colorectal disease2018

Management of complex polyps of the colon and rectum.

Fernando A Angarita, Adina E Feinberg, Stanley M Feinberg, Robert H Riddell, J Andrea McCart

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of colorectal disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Participants' experiences of the management of screen-detected complex polyps within a structured bowel cancer screening programme.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fernando A AngaritaDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8546-7309
Adina E FeinbergDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Stanley M FeinbergDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Robert H RiddellDepartments of Pathobiology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
J Andrea McCartDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. amccart@mtsinai.on.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

puprposeBenign polyps that are technically challenging and unsafe to remove via polypectomy are known as complex polyps. Concerns regarding safety and completeness of resection dictate they undergo advanced endoscopic techniques, such as endoscopic mucosal resection or surgery. We provide a comprehensive overview of complex polyps and current treatment options.

methodsA review of the English literature was conducted to identifyarticles describing the management of complex polyps of the colon and rectum.

resultsEndoscopic mucosal resection is the standard of care for the majority of complex polyps. Only polyps that fail endoscopic mucosal resection or are highly suspicious of invasive cancer but which cannot be removed endoscopically warrant surgery.

conclusionSeveral factors influence the treatment of a complex polyp; therefore, there cannot be a "one-size-fitsall" approach. Treatment should be tailored to the lesion's characteristics, the risk of adverse events, and the resources available to the treating physician.

Indexed as

Colonic PolypsColonoscopyHumansRectumColonic polypsColorectal polypsEndoscopic mucosal resectionEndoscopySurgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.