Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29282494›Full record

ReviewAnnals of hematology2018

Incidence of neutropenia and use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in multiple myeloma: is current clinical practice adequate?

Xavier Leleu, Francesca Gay, Anne Flament, Kim Allcott, Michel Delforge

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of hematology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Pegfilgrastim for primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in multiple myeloma.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Xavier LeleuDepartment of Haematology and CIC Inserm U1082, Hôpital La Milétrie, Poitiers, France. xavier.leleu@chu-poitiers.fr.
Francesca GayMyeloma Unit, Division of Haematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Anne FlamentAmgen (Europe) GmbH, Brussels, Belgium.
Kim AllcottOxford PharmaGenesis, Tubney, Oxfordshire, OX13 5QJ, UK.
Michel DelforgeDepartment of Haematology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Amgen (Belgium) · BEAzienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · ITInserm · FROxford Instruments (United Kingdom) · GBUniversitair Ziekenhuis Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although immunomodulatory drugs, alkylating agents, corticosteroids, protease inhibitors, and therapeutic monoclonal antibodies improve multiple myeloma outcomes, treatment burden is still an issue. Neutropenia is a known complication of cytotoxic cancer therapy and is often associated with infections; it is an important consideration in myeloma given the fact that patients often have a weakened immune system. The risk of febrile neutropenia increases with severe and persisting neutropenia. Recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) are commonly used to reduce the incidence, duration, and severity of febrile neutropenia. Here, we review the risk and management of neutropenia associated with new and commonly used anti-myeloma agents. Few papers report the use of G-CSF in patients with multiple myeloma receiving anti-cancer treatments, and fewer describe whether G-CSF was beneficial. None of the identified studies reported G-CSF primary prophylaxis. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the need for G-CSF prophylaxis in multiple myeloma. Prophylaxis may be particularly useful in patients at high risk of prolonged severe neutropenia.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansIncidenceMultiple MyelomaNeutropeniaGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorG-CSFGranulocyte colony-stimulating factorsMultiple myelomaNeutropenia

Identifiers

PMID29282494
PMCPMC5797221
OpenAlexW2779357669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.