Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29282445›Full record

ReviewCureus2017

Curated Collection for Educators: Five Key Papers about the Flipped Classroom Methodology.

Andrew King, Megan Boysen-Osborn, Robert Cooney, Jennifer Mitzman, Asit Misra, Jennifer Williams, Tina Dulani, Michael Gottlieb

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. ["Flipped classroom"-A future concept for student teaching in ophthalmology?]Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2021
    Article
  9. Novel educational adjuncts for the World Health Organization Basic Emergency Care Course: A prospective cohort study.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrew KingEmergency Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center.
Megan Boysen-OsbornEmergency Medicine, University of California at Irvine.
Robert CooneyEmergency Medicine, Geisinger Medical Center.
Jennifer MitzmanEmergency Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center.
Asit MisraOhiohealth Learning, OhioHealth.
Jennifer WilliamsEmergency Medicine, University of Queensland.
Tina DulaniEmergency Medicine, Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine, North Shore University Hospital.
Michael GottliebDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The flipped classroom (FC) pedagogy is becoming increasingly popular in medical education due to its appeal to the millennial learner and potential benefits in knowledge acquisition. Despite its popularity and effectiveness, the FC educational method is not without challenges. In this article, we identify and summarize several key papers relevant to medical educators interested in exploring the FC teaching methodology. The authors identified an extensive list of papers relevant to FC pedagogy via online discussions within the Academic Life in Emergency Medicine (ALiEM) Faculty Incubator. This list was augmented by an open call on Twitter (utilizing the #meded, #FOAMed, and #flippedclassroom hashtags) yielding a list of 33 papers. We then conducted a three-round modified Delphi process within the authorship group, which included both junior and senior clinician educators, to identify the most impactful papers for educators interested in FC pedagogy. The three-round modified Delphi process ranked all of the selected papers and selected the five most highly-rated papers for inclusion. The authorship group reviewed and summarized these papers with specific consideration given to their value to junior faculty educators and faculty developers interested in the flipped classroom approach. The list of papers featured in this article serves as a key reading list for junior clinician educators and faculty developers interested in the flipped classroom technique. The associated commentaries contextualize the importance of these papers for medical educators aiming to optimize their understanding and implementation of the flipped classroom methodology in their teaching and through faculty development.

Indexed as

curated collectionflipped classroommedical educationmodified delphi methodpedagogy

Identifiers

PMID29282445
PMCPMC5741279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.