ArticleCureus2017
The Utility of Social Media in Providing Information on Zika Virus.
Article in Cureus, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Public Health Strategies in the Face of Crisis: A Comprehensive Review of the Zika Outbreak in India.Cureus · 2024Review
- The role of social media in public health crises caused by infectious disease: a scoping review.BMJ global health · 2023Article
- Content Quality of YouTube Videos About Pain Management After Cesarean Birth: Content Analysis.JMIR infodemiology · 2023Article
- Harnessing Social Media in the Modelling of Pandemics-Challenges and Opportunities.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2021Article
- The virtual infertility community: a qualitative analysis of patient experiences shared on Instagram.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2021Article
- Public perceptions of threats from mosquitoes in the U.S. using online media analytics.Pathogens and global health · 2021Article
- Rumor surveillance methods in outbreaks: A systematic literature review.Health promotion perspectives · 2021Review
- COVID-19 pandemic: a double trouble for Indian adolescents and young adults living with type 1 diabetes.International journal of diabetes in developing countries · 2020Article
- Trending on Social Media: Integrating Social Media into Infectious Disease Dynamics.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2020Review
- A Mobile Health Platform to Disseminate Validated Institutional Measurements During the COVID-19 Outbreak: Utilization-Focused Evaluation Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2020Article
- Causal Relationships Among Pollen Counts, Tweet Numbers, and Patient Numbers for Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Surveillance: Retrospective Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Article
- Mosquito control practices and perceptions: An analysis of economic stakeholders during the Zika epidemic in Belize, Central America.PloS one · 2018Article
- Article
- Managing epidemics in the digital age: the crucial role of social media in information dissemination.Pathogens and global healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction In 2015, there was an outbreak of Zika virus in Brazil that spread throughout the Americas. The association of Zika virus with birth defects in infants born to infected pregnant women created concern for women of childbearing age. Social media is an important platform for health promotion, communication, and education on preventative methods during Zika virus outbreaks. Methods We evaluated the utility of social media on providing information regarding Zika virus. Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube were utilized for our study. A search of the term "#Zikavirus" on Twitter and Instagram, and "Zika virus" on Facebook and YouTube was performed. The first 50 search results were analyzed from each source. Only English, Spanish, or Portuguese results were included. Results were categorized into three groups: "Useful", "Not Useful", or "Misleading". Results Search was conducted on December 17th, 2016, with 185 results. Forty (21.6%) were from Facebook, 50 (27%) from Twitter, 48 (25.9%) from YouTube, and 47 (25.4%) from Instagram. A total of 104 (56.22%) results were "Useful", 67 (36.2%) "Not Useful", and 14 (7.5%) were "Misleading". There were significantly more "Useful" results compared to "Not Useful" and "Misleading" results (Fisher's exact: p < 0.0001). Conclusion Social media is a useful resource for providing relevant information on Zika virus. Young women can utilize social media for Zika virus information. The role of social media in public health should be further investigated and established. Patient education interventions should focus on social media impact on behavior modification and education of public to recognize useful information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.