Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29282290›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of biological chemistry2018

Phosphoinositide conversion in endocytosis and the endolysosomal system.

Alexander Wallroth, Volker Haucke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Organelle contact sites in cancer cells.Cell death & disease · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Architecture of the human KICSTOR and GATOR1-KICSTOR complexes.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Expression of Tailored α-N-Acetylglucosaminidase inBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexander WallrothFrom the Leibniz-Institut für Molekulare Pharmakologie (FMP), Robert-Rössle-Strasse 10, 13125 Berlin and.
Volker HauckeFrom the Leibniz-Institut für Molekulare Pharmakologie (FMP), Robert-Rössle-Strasse 10, 13125 Berlin and haucke@fmp-berlin.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phosphoinositides (PIs) are phospholipids that perform crucial cell functions, ranging from cell migration and signaling to membrane trafficking, by serving as signposts of compartmental membrane identity. Although phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate, 3-phosphate, and 3,5-bisphosphate are commonly considered as hallmarks of the plasma membrane, endosomes, and lysosomes, these compartments contain other functionally important PIs. Here, we review the roles of PIs in different compartments of the endolysosomal system in mammalian cells and discuss the mechanisms that spatiotemporally control PI conversion in endocytosis and endolysosomal membrane dynamics during endosome maturation and sorting. As defective PI conversion underlies human genetic diseases, including inherited myopathies, neurological disorders, and cancer, PI-converting enzymes represent potential targets for drug-based therapies.

Indexed as

AnimalsEndocytosisEndosomesHumansLysosomesPhosphatidylinositol Phosphatesras ProteinsSignal Transductionphosphatidylinositol 3,4-diphosphatePhosphatidylinositol Phosphatesras ProteinsautophagyendocytosisendosomelysosomemTOR complex (mTORC)phosphatidylinositolphosphatidylinositol kinase (PI Kinase)phosphatidylinositol phosphatasephosphatidylinositol signaling

Identifiers

PMID29282290
PMCPMC5798284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.